UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

[Kenward Garg]

Lots of people getting worked up about a nothing article. The majority of the media has ignored it because they see what it is - rehashed old news. Far more column inches on Ole's current woes - I'm just going to sit back and enjoy the popcorn while that pans out. Looking forward to next Wednesday as well.

“Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.”

Napoleon Bonaparte

 

[Kenward Garg]

The full force of our owners Lawyers would be that something more solid.

From what I’ve read, albeit, very little: City could “ruin” UEFA if it ever came to court.

 

[Rolee]

For anyone sensible who doesn't want to click on that crap:-



The full article is here:-

http://web.archive.org/web/20200123...accounting-sponsorships-uefa-champions-league

It takes a few seconds extra to load the website. Always use DumpTheGuardian instead of linking directly to them.

https://theguardian.fivefilters.org/how-to-share/#howto

What has been revealed in this article that wasn't previously known?

 

[Kenward Garg]

I left Tom Morgan the links to the real story and City's refusal to deal this time. Of course, he and the rest of the Telegraph journalists (or any other news organisation) won't even try to reveal the truth.

If you’d like to, there’s a discussion about MCFC and FFP with Colin Savage. He explained it all years ago:

 

[jaiguruKun]

He's a City fan. Then we are taken over. Now he reports shite about our club, and that is based upon where our owners are from. Maybe I am wrong, I thought he was a City fan, I cannot see ANY other reason for him hating our/his club.

I don't think he hates City, I've read his book and actually quite enjoyed it although it was critical of the club in parts it was as part of a critique of football in general.

 

[Centurions]

What has been revealed in this article that wasn't previously known?

Absolutely nothing, he's used this supposed upcoming meeting to regurgitate his previous crap. It's literally a copy & paste job, I wonder if his bosses will notice or care?

 

[Kenward Garg]

Of course that might be another explanantion for why this story about us has appeared now. You'd think a paper as fearless and The Guardian would be all over the hacking story wouldn't you? Yet not a peep.

I’ve read they lost their “bottle” after the Snowden leaks and instead of exposing the corruption of the secret services; they decided to work with them instead, by being their mouthpiece.

 

[Rolee]

Absolutely nothing, he's used this supposed upcoming meeting to regurgitate his previous crap. It's literally a copy & paste job, I wonder if his bosses will notice or care?

That's what I thought but then his use of the word 'exclusive' has me doubting myself.

 

[Norbiton]

Absolutely nothing, he's used this supposed upcoming meeting to regurgitate his previous crap. It's literally a copy & paste job, I wonder if his bosses will notice or care?

We didn't show PwC paper bank statements at a meeting (they forgot to repeat their request) and the copy of one of the sponsorship deals they saw wasn't signed. Should have been a five year ban obviously

 

[Prestwich_Blue]

I’ve read they lost their “bottle” after the Snowden leaks and instead of exposing the corruption of the secret services; they decided to work with them instead, by being their mouthpiece.

And they're also the mouthpiece of certain agents. Agents who might have been behind the Football Leaks hacks.