So this is cut and dried now?People like to be bullish about these things but City are being screwed and there's not much we can do about it.
So this is cut and dried now?People like to be bullish about these things but City are being screwed and there's not much we can do about it.
The governing bodies have ben determined to get us for years,to think he is doing notjing is bolocks,tje governing bodies are corupt,american owner and tebas etc are putting pressure on them to finish us,we might not ever be able to beat them whoever is on charge,it's more down to legal team tjan himwell he doesn’t stand up and be counted does he. We’ve been treated like shit for a decade; what’s going to change
How can they be so uninformed and plain wrong, while being so confident about it?
From today back to 2016? No that's not at all what we were investigated for it was prior to 2013 if I remember right and nothing after it as 2014 is when we were coming close to being in profit if I remember right.
It was also about a single payment when Etihad took expectedly high losses, which left them in need of securing funds to meet their contractual obligations(legal) as any other sponsor in the same situation would have to do. This is a game of Chinese whispers and the press make no effort to clarify it which says it all, it's now become "They've proven[City have something to say bout that] Sheikh Mansour pays all the Etihad money every season".
I don't know what Etihad's finances are these days but they are a state owned airline and that state is not short on cash. They defy logic to belief this made up conspiracy and it looks like it's going to stick unfortunately. Even if we get this thrown out by CAS or a real court this has "proven it" and much much more(everything they can dream up) for the dumb-dumbs.
I'm wondering whether CAS has given UEFA the heads up saying the leaking of information is not the right thing to do and you will get a slap on the wristI'm not so sure CAS have seemingly been sympathetic towards us so far:-
"CAS said that the alleged leaking of information by UEFA was ‘worrisome’. It added that City’s complaints over the leaks do not ‘appear to be entirely without merit’.
The panel also said that it was puzzled as to how Leterme who responded aggressively to City’s claims branding them ‘groundless in the merits and unacceptable in tone’ could be ‘so confident to “vehemently reject” (City’s) allegations’.
CAS also noted that City could bring another appeal to them in future, after UEFA’s investigation has concluded and should they be unsatisfied with the decision."
This is what a 10 year media mis-information campaign does to other teams' fans.Im not being funny or having a dig. But I thought it was common knowledge that your owner put his money into the club via Etihad.
My point is, and the point I hope you actually go all out on is that your owner has the means to pump whatever he wants to into the club, he should be allowed to do that. Your club is not at risk of going under?So its not to protect your club, so whats the problem? Hopefully the FFP rule is scrapped.
How did PSG manage to not get any sort of punishment?
The email talked about “his highness” IIRC this was assumed to be Mansour again IIRC only the head of the UAE is referenced in this wayTheir accusation all stems from the email about Mansour supplying the money instead of Etihad.
It should be open and shut, because if it left an Etihad bank account, it came from Etihad, end of.
So this is cut and dried now?