Because people keep posting the full article, which we can’t do because of copyright laws.
If I was being a cynic, I might think that a fair few cancelled subscriptions from City fans over the weekend urgently necessitated a fairly pro-City piece on their platform.
Read the thread and you’ll find what you are looking for.I understand that but I was asking for it to be sent privately or at least where I could find it
Maybe wrong but I thought CAS would be more about following the procedures , and if they rule against UEFA on procedure that’s as far as they will go. If we wanted to go further we’d have to make a claim for damages against UEFA probably in a different court. So the CAS hearing we are more concerned with overturning the decision not clearing our name , hence the ‘initial’ part of the club statement.
I get that sir, wasn’t having a pop. Honest.
I do try to be objective and wouldn’t take any outlet as guaranteed but it’s nice to see a little bit of pro City news amidst all the fucking hounds out there.
I think that’s correct. CAS is about the process and procedure - is it fair and reasonable ( and does it align with uefa process and procedure?) and ultimately - is the sanction a reasonable response to the findings of the investigation. So we do have a few bites of the cherry in terms of procedure and we must be very guilty of serious wrongdoing to have a sanction as severe as the one awarded upheld.
As "give it to gordon" stated it is cold weather out there. ;)I have..... Ci
Fuck that, it's half term for us bone-idle teachers.Walk into work with our heads held high tomorrow blues. We’re better than them
No biggie we just...cough cough.....sign up a couple more sponsorship deals. :)This is as severe as it comes. Missing two seasons of European football and a £30m fine will cost us £200m+.