UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

[Prestwich_Blue]

I reckon that's right. In fact I seem to recall that Khaldoon is officially titled "His Excellency". Correct me if I'm wrong.

Khaldoon isn't royal so he's HE.

 

[johnnytapia]

Ha ha fantastic, was only pulling your leg pal.
Have a great week. ;)

Ta bud. Just smashing open the next bottle of red.

 

[HarrytheBlue]

Colin in your opinion if we win the case at cas do you think that will be the end of it or will we go for the jugular afterwards?

Difficult question to answer but interested in your opinion on this.

Without doubt, get through CAS, which is really a 'was due process followed?' procedure, we'll go for the throat -i.e. the legality of FFP.

 

[BillCarlisle]

Khaldoon isn't royal so he's HE.

As I thought. Thanks for confirming it.

 

[Dirty Harry]

That's not a defence though. We are in deep shit if that is the way we are appealing.

This has to be fought on what we have not done, not what others have.

Hypocrisy is everywhere in society, it is overlooked when it serves a purpose.

As I said mate, PART of our strategy, it shows UEFA setting a precedent and gives CAS a clear example and base to assess our the merits of our case, we’re building a picture.

 

[bluemonkey71]

Yes but HH without a name is not Mansour

I’m confused now.i thought @Keith Moon lived out there and knew the protocol. Someone is incorrect.

 

[Blue Maverick]

Can’t wait to go on holiday in June wear my shirt, any dick that says anything about us is getting it full on, don’t think my wife will be best pleased.

 

[The Stockport Iniesta]

Without doubt, get through CAS, which is really a 'was due process followed?' procedure, we'll go for the throat -i.e. the legality of FFP.

Hope so mate.

 

[chedinho]

I have a feeling Spanish Dave will jump ship in the summer.

 

[Roachy]

I think that’s correct. CAS is about the process and procedure - is it fair and reasonable ( and does it align with uefa process and procedure?) and ultimately - is the sanction a reasonable response to the findings of the investigation. So we do have a few bites of the cherry in terms of procedure and we must be very guilty of serious wrongdoing to have a sanction as severe as the one awarded upheld.

I've been thinking about this scenario. What if UEFA have used (as we suspect and hope) a pile of rubbish, nonsense and untruths as the basis for this sanction. Also let's suppose that hypothetically, they have followed the correct procedure and process throughout, although they haven't from what we know. Surely it cannot be the case that because the process was followed but their evidence is incorrect that the sanction, or a slightly lesser one, is allowed to stand. At some point there must be a function where the validity of their evidence is looked at and interrogated.