mancity2012_eamo
Well-Known Member
Did I misinterpret the CAS report or is it not true that only evidence that has already been presented in the ruling against us is admissible now. UEFA can't throw anything new into the mix now.I'd assume that the lawyers involved would be the ones who see the information, and they'd generally be pretty keen to keep their reputations intact.
@gordondaviesmoustache's point about maybe holding back up to now sounds like a reasonable point, but presumably doesn't hold when it goes to CAS.
I also took that as meaning if we have anything up our sleeve, it had better be in the 200 page dossier, as we can't present anything new at this point in time. That would have to come after CAS.
Have I got that wrong?