thanks Kazzydeyna for a mature and reasoned response as opposed to all the crap I’ve received on here for my comment.
I have little knowledge of the law but always felt that if you were in the right then no problem, you win.
It seems, not the case, you need to win by playing games and out manoeuvring your opponent. Why I don’t know.
The main point of my concern is that by appointing a skilled, the best there is lawyer, just maybe, our basic argument of righteousness, regarding no initial defence or simple proof of legitimate funds transfers does not exist at all. We are going to have to fight this on a technicality which, while hopefully winning the case, will not ultimately absolve City from holier than thou innocence.