UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
So my journo mate has just text me to say tonight’s Norwich win might cement our league win as finishing 2nd means we’ll win the league. I asked him to explain more and all he would answer in “multiple hackers” He won’t say any more despite me threatening to tell his wife every secret I have on him haha. Any one know what he’s on about? My only explanation is that the dippers have been hacking more teams than us and are getting found out. No idea. Sounds too good to be true but he’s not the kind of bloke to wum so got me excited! On the other hand he might be pissed and on the wind up??
Absolutely fcuk all will happen to the dippers. They could murder a load of people in a foreign country and it would be swept under the carpet/forgotten about, so this is comedy.
 
"In the end this FFP chamber relied more on out of context stolen emails than all the other evidence we provided"
Not "purpoted", just stolen. You can't steal made up emails. The emails are real, accept it. Also the legitimacy of the emails has nothing to do with the confidentiality of the CFCB decisions or investigations.
'Purported' is the word used in the club statement to refer to their status as hacked or stolen. Capiche? The very persuasive point made by posters on here and others is not that they were invented but that they were doctored - edited and changed to fit a false narrative. It seems that you and @Ric are incapable of grasping that simple fact. As for your claim our CEO discussing key apects of the grounds for our appeal prior to its hearing would not prejudice the CAS process - well let's just leave that absurd remark for you to reconsider.
 
I'd say whatever you like if you could put me 5 yards from Piers Morgan in front of a live camera.

In a totally non-domestic terrorism way

I was hoping Ant Middleton would at least get him in a chokehold and have him pleading for mercy when he appeared. Morgan kept on taunting, calling him little fella. Mmmmm.....fat, privileged out of shape broadcaster versus ex special forces soldier. Should end well.
 
'Purported' is the word used in the club statement to refer to their status as hacked or stolen. Capiche? The very persuasive point made by posters on here and others is not that they were invented but that they were doctored - edited and changed to fit a false narrative. It seems that you and @Ric are incapable of grasping that simple fact. As for your claim our CEO discussing key apects of the grounds for our appeal prior to its hearing would not prejudice the CAS process - well let's just leave that absurd remark for you to reconsider.

The CEO has admitted they are stolen and out of context in a heavily edited in house interview that would have been poured over dozens of times by every lawyer and PR person at the club.

If the club's position was that they were not legit, he would not have said that, or they would have edited it out.

Also, no one has made a convincing argument that the emails were doctored at all. All that's been said is that Rui Pinto was an extortionist who stole 300k a decade ago which we all already knew.

As for your complete lack of understanding of the confidentiality complaint, I don't know what else to say...but perhaps the most obvious thing would be to let you know that the club has already made the grounds for our appeal public via the first CAS appeal.
 
The CEO has admitted they are stolen and out of context in a heavily edited in house interview that would have been poured over dozens of times by every lawyer and PR person at the club. If the club's position was that they were not legit, he would not have said that, or they would have edited it out.
As for your complete lack of understanding of the confidentiality complaint, I don't know what else to say...
You actually think the club's position is that "purportedly hacked or stolen emails" claimed by UEFA to prove we broke FFP rules are 'legit' despite our CEO categorically stating we haven't. That is a truly stupid post.
 
Where are we at now then, post appeal?

Any new info come to light or likely scenarios?

I know this is the lazy option but this thread is like Tevez, De Rossi, Pogba and every Isco thread combined.
 
You actually think the club's position is that "purportedly hacked or stolen emails" claimed by UEFA to prove we broke FFP rules are 'legit' despite our CEO categorically stating we haven't. That is a truly stupid post.

It is the club CEOs official position that these emails are stolen and taken out of context.

Because they are stolen and taken out of context.

Not stolen and edited.

Not fabricated.

Stolen and taken out of context.

Jesus Christ
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.