Intake it you're a Brexit/Trump supporter then?
Meanwhile their record on investigative journalism is widely known and respect Ed in the profession of journalism which has ethical standard on such reporting.
Point to a consistent track record of lying or reporting from flimsy sources? The two times I can recall where the Iraq WMD article that was propaganda from Bush's administration and the writer who was found to make up stories. Their standards, if anything, have increased.
Are they without criticism ever? No. But going after their credibility here does not make much sense. What's the angle for them to lie here or portray City poorly, again?
Really don't understand your NY Times fan club, but in 2018 they had to print over 4100 retractions and/or corrections, they published 55k articles, so over 7% of everything they published contained errors.I have very little respect for Journalist's these days but to me an error rate of 7 % is a fucking disgrace, certainly nothing to lauded or place on a pedestal of professional excellence.