I reported a rumour and stated it as such. I don't know if its true, thats why its a rumour at the moment. If you don't listen to rumours you can ignore.Not reported anywhere but here, so is it true or usual rumour bollocks
I reported a rumour and stated it as such. I don't know if its true, thats why its a rumour at the moment. If you don't listen to rumours you can ignore.Not reported anywhere but here, so is it true or usual rumour bollocks
Just heard a rumour that Pannick didn't take the brief in the end...don't shoot the messenger...
It would have happened a while ago that he turned it down. It happens if there is a clash with some other matter or where there is a potential conflict. How often - not sure. I've had a senior QC take on a major enquiry (Grenfell) so drop my case - understandable and not about my case's merits.
If indeed Pannick didn't take the brief wouldn't you think the club would say who actually did take it as the perception of all has been that Pannick was leading our appeal until your post a few minutes ago?
I've no idea, because I haven't seen a shred of evidence from one side or the other. And even if I had, I'm still not a CAS arbitrator.What’s your take on next week now mate. How are you feeling/thinking about it?
Think of Pannick as your best centre forward and you are approaching one of the biggest games of the season, playing your local rivals awayI went from thinking this was going to be a piece of piss to now thinking we’re fucked.
Think we'll be exonerated because of dubious, biased and unsound process, evidence being ignored and double jeopardy (2017 settlement).
Wouldn't be surprised though if CAS kicked the case back to UEFA and City to sort out.
Think of Pannick as your best centre forward and you are approaching one of the biggest games of the season, playing your local rivals away
The forward goes and cracks a couple of ribs in a taxi accident three days before the game
What hope have you got of winning!!