Jazzman
Well-Known Member
So David Conn is a blue who actively does everything he can to harm the club. Well fuck him.
Last edited:
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST
- Thread starter razman
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
B
B
blueinsa
Guest
I did use the word maybe, it was a theory as to why he writes what he does. I have no idea why he writes what he writes though.
He writes what he writes because he knows negative + City = clicks and revenue.
Some fucking blue he is!
Sorry mate it’s a fact he is a blue.
The trouble with Conn is before all this FFP he was always against City having new owners, not based on any finance fiddling or human rights but because it changed his view of City.
That of being the underdog, the laughed at club with fans who supported them no matter what. He looks like he took pride in following a failing club as if it was a badge of honour.
I remember it being different, it was a nightmare having to watch the dross we watched.
What he never asked was did all the fans agree with him that it was ok to be shit. No he decided his view was correct.
Fuck him.
Tim of the Oak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2012
- Messages
- 20,867
Sorry mate it’s a fact he is a blue.
OK mate then it’s a bit sad he pretended to be an FC Utd fan to make a few extra quid. I liked reading “Richer than God” btw but he seems to have taken on the mantle of the biggest anti Blue since then. I’m glad Franny Lee shattered his City dreams.
blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
Was he involved in a counter bid? I must have missed that.OK mate then it’s a bit sad he pretended to be an FC Utd fan to make a few extra quid. I liked reading “Richer than God” btw but he seems to have taken on the mantle of the biggest anti Blue since then. I’m glad Franny Lee shattered his City dreams.
So David Conn is a blue who active does everything he can to harm the club. Well fuck him.
More to do with if you write a positive article you get no-one reading it or clicking it thats why anyone who are city supporters at sky or in paper media seems to always edge on the lets give city a kicking.
I've been reading David Conn's work for years. He is one of the best journalists out there and I don't think it's true to say that he is anti-City.
He has a traditional Guardian outlook on the world, but many people have a view of the world distorted through the prism of your political outlook, just as we as City fans view everything through blue tinted glasses. '
Just because someone publishes something which you might regard as bad news, does not mean the writer has a vendetta against City. They maybe correct. They may also just be influenced by the information out there, and it's possible that under strict confidence David Conn may have got this angle from UEFA.
He has a traditional Guardian outlook on the world, but many people have a view of the world distorted through the prism of your political outlook, just as we as City fans view everything through blue tinted glasses. '
Just because someone publishes something which you might regard as bad news, does not mean the writer has a vendetta against City. They maybe correct. They may also just be influenced by the information out there, and it's possible that under strict confidence David Conn may have got this angle from UEFA.
My. concern is this.
Will CAS be totally independent when it comes to City, or will UEFA and their European Royalty(that’s back fired on those fans touting that title for their clubs) cartel clubs put pressure on CAS privately to make an example of City?
Because if City come out of this vindicated and winners, it will embarrass and damage UEFA and their European cartel clubs badly.
Will UEFA and their cartel clubs allow that to happen via the true facts and through CAS?
Will CAS be totally independent when it comes to City, or will UEFA and their European Royalty(that’s back fired on those fans touting that title for their clubs) cartel clubs put pressure on CAS privately to make an example of City?
Because if City come out of this vindicated and winners, it will embarrass and damage UEFA and their European cartel clubs badly.
Will UEFA and their cartel clubs allow that to happen via the true facts and through CAS?
Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
I've been reading David Conn's work for years. He is one of the best journalists out there and I don't think it's true to say that he is anti-City.
He has a traditional Guardian outlook on the world, but many people have a view of the world distorted through the prism of your political outlook, just as we as City fans view everything through blue tinted glasses. '
Just because someone publishes something which you might regard as bad news, does not mean the writer has a vendetta against City. They maybe correct. They may also just be influenced by the information out there, and it's possible that under strict confidence David Conn may have got this angle from UEFA.
Can you think of anything positive he's written in the last 10 years or so ?
Without adding something about our owners or financial situation ?
He said when the FFP storm hit after Der Spiegel that it was unlikely that it would lead to a ban. I've been reading his stuff for years. He likes City, but not our owners. A bit like Hattenstone. These people are decent journalists in my opinion because they report things as they see them. As long as you understand where they are coming from, then it's useful.Can you think of anything positive he's written in the last 10 years or so ?
Without adding something about our owners or financial situation ?
Tim of the Oak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2012
- Messages
- 20,867
Was he involved in a counter bid? I must have missed that.
In “Richer than God”, Conn job wrote that he lost some faith with City when he met Franny Lee soon after the takeover, who only appeared to be interested in the money from Sky. Franny had been Conn’s hero as a player.
Nightmare Walking
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 27 May 2014
- Messages
- 5,227
I've been reading David Conn's work for years. He is one of the best journalists out there and I don't think it's true to say that he is anti-City.
He has a traditional Guardian outlook on the world, but many people have a view of the world distorted through the prism of your political outlook, just as we as City fans view everything through blue tinted glasses. '
Just because someone publishes something which you might regard as bad news, does not mean the writer has a vendetta against City. They maybe correct. They may also just be influenced by the information out there, and it's possible that under strict confidence David Conn may have got this angle from UEFA.
He is pro FC United. FC United are the total antithesis of everying that it means to be a City fan. You stick by your club through thick and thin.
Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
He said when the FFP storm hit after Der Spiegel that it was unlikely that it would lead to a ban. I've been reading his stuff for years. He likes City, but not our owners. A bit like Hattenstone. These people are decent journalists in my opinion because they report things as they see them. As long as you understand where they are coming from, then it's useful.
I think, first & foremost, he is a hater of our owners, then 2nd, someone who would like to be a City fan, but isn't, because he hates them, so hates them even more.
That's my 'understanding' of where these people are coming from.
blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
Ah ok....not read his book, thought I'd missed something. Cheers.In “Richer than God”, Conn job wrote that he lost some faith with City when he met Franny Lee soon after the takeover, who only appeared to be interested in the money from Sky. Franny had been Conn’s hero as a player.
Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
In “Richer than God”, Conn job wrote that he lost some faith with City when he met Franny Lee soon after the takeover, who only appeared to be interested in the money from Sky. Franny had been Conn’s hero as a player.
Finance not his thing then ?
Brendan110_0
Well-Known Member
My. concern is this.
Will CAS be totally independent when it comes to City, or will UEFA and their European Royalty(that’s back fired on those fans touting that title for their clubs) cartel clubs put pressure on CAS privately to make an example of City?
Because if City come out of this vindicated and winners, it will embarrass and damage UEFA and their European cartel clubs badly.
Will UEFA and their cartel clubs allow that to happen via the true facts and through CAS?
It's a sports court not just football, so the chance of cartel influence is terribly small. Whatever the CAS decision we go with it.
It's a sports court not just football, so the chance of cartel influence is terribly small. Whatever the CAS decision we go with it.
Thanks.
That’s reassuring.
SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,557
I never said he writes positive articles but I can confirm he is a blue.
Sorry mate it’s a fact he is a blue.
*was
I've been reading David Conn's work for years. He is one of the best journalists out there and I don't think it's true to say that he is anti-City.
He has a traditional Guardian outlook on the world, but many people have a view of the world distorted through the prism of your political outlook, just as we as City fans view everything through blue tinted glasses. '
Just because someone publishes something which you might regard as bad news, does not mean the writer has a vendetta against City. They maybe correct. They may also just be influenced by the information out there, and it's possible that under strict confidence David Conn may have got this angle from UEFA.
Doesn't surprise me you read the Guardian and are pro Conn. If UEFA have feed Conn information its because they knew he's put a negative spin on it.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.