Whilst I would tend to agree mate and we must not get carried away, my own personal opinion (FWIW) is that this whole thing has been gamed-out for months.
A multi-billion pound business cannot risk its entire model and reputation on a 50/50 verdict over a three-day arbitration hearing.
Bluffs and counter-bluffs have been called, but in reality, there is surely too much damage involved for pragmatism to have not come to the fore way before now?
It is absolute folly and bravado at best to have not reached a suitable settlement beforehand, unless..
A) our evidence is so clear cut it should have been evident to CAS.
B) It was in someone's interests to have let it go this far.
C) A deal was done months ago behind the scenes by the real power brokers and City are complicit.
If it is none of the above and our appeal is not upheld, then we have been stupid beyond belief, irrespective of our own conviction at innocence.
Plenty of innocent people have been imprisoned.
I don't really care which one we are, only that we beat this charge and we've not just bet it all on black at the turn of a wheel.