He’s basing that on absolutely no knowledge of the case whatsoever.
I really cannot fathom how many have spoken with such confidence on the case without clearly knowing anything.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST
- Thread starter razman
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
I really cannot fathom how many have spoken with such confidence on the case without clearly knowing anything.
bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
Well, as the Treasurer of UEFA, Gill must know the result. He will be interested in the huge legal costs his organisation has paid in its two-year witchunt against City.Quote from the BBC
"Ole Gunnar Solskjaer says Manchester United will not "panic" if they miss out on next season's Champions League.
Despite becoming the first side in Premier League history to win four successive games by three clear goals, United are still fifth in the table.
The top four qualify for the Champions League but fifth suffices if Manchester City's European ban is upheld.
"The club wouldn't panic or go crazy with plans we've already talked about for years to come," said Solskjaer.
"But some short-term decisions will be easier to make if you get the Champions League."
Maybe that suggests something also?
All embargoed Judgments I have ever seen had no more than a 48 hour embargo. Most were 24 hours. I agree entirely with you Stefan they will not have known for weeks. However they will have been confident after the hearing if it went well.I'm 100% they haven't known for weeks FWIW. Maybe from Weds at the earliest, Friday by close of business most probably. Absolutely no reason to let sides know weeks in advance. Simply makes a leak likely.
He’s basing that on absolutely no knowledge of the case whatsoever.
I really cannot fathom how many have spoken with such confidence on the case without clearly knowing anything.
It's more a case of wishful thinking with Shearer and Pearce. The tone of the voice gives it away.
Shocking football, even 21's smashed it long until somebody had the balls to say this guy hasn't got a clue and sacked him !The one good thing about City under Pearce was that there were no queues at the chippy cos so many people couldn’t be arsed
bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
Well he speaks on football tactics.....something he knows nothing about based on his performance as City Manager.He’s basing that on absolutely no knowledge of the case whatsoever.
I really cannot fathom how many have spoken with such confidence on the case without clearly knowing anything.
I don’t think Pearce or Shearer dislike us, they just have to give an opinion as that’s what they are there for and because they don’t know anything about it, they’ve just gone with the status quo original decision.It's more a case of wishful thinking with Shearer and Pearce. The tone of the voice gives it away.
I don’t think Pearce or Shearer dislike us, they just have to give an opinion as that’s what they are there for and because they don’t know anything about it, they’ve just gone with the status quo original decision.
Disagree there pal. Maybe not Shearer so much but Pearce fucking hates us. Still bitter that we binned him.
bluestreak
Well-Known Member
Like he was sent a draft of both sides argument to look over before he made his informed decision ..... he should concentrate on making sure any teams he manages in the future score when playing home games
Perhaps he consulted Beany:)
True.Well he speaks on football tactics.....something he knows nothing about based on his performance as City Manager.
I don’t dislike the man despite such a miserable time as a season ticket holder, under him.
I’ve always respected him as a bloke, he’s just a bit thick.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.