UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
Everyone makes mistakes, but if they correct them, then one shouldn't be held against them. I don't recall him going OTT either.

He can only report what he finds out/is told, and if it's clear that the words are from the source, not his, then he's just being a journalist. A bit like Sam Lee's comments yesterday, and Ziegler several times.

Yep, that's what I thought.....until @petrusha just posted the stuff Rabin has dug up on him!
 
I don't see a problem with that headline, assuming it's Panja's own.

It's entirely possible that investigators DID want to boot City. It isn't necessarily his opinion being put forward. If he's said that he thinks it should be done, it would come down to how it was worded.
If you don't see a problem with that a million miles away is not even close to the distance you are away from understanding the agenda against us. Given the background laid out in the post that is a really stupid comment if I may say so.
 
If you don't see a problem with that a million miles away is not even close to the distance you are away from understanding the agenda against us. Given the background laid out in that post that is a really stupid comment if I may say so.

You may, and I will point out that I referred to the headline.

And I am fully aware of how City are viewed by many, I just don't subscribe that every bloody detail and post by anyone ever is part of it.
 
See this Twitter thread from a few hours ago by the estimable @City_rabin before making a judgement about Tariq Panja - who, IIRC, once worked for the MEN and has close ties to David Gill (think @tolmie's hairdoo has posted on this before.

Anyway, the start of Rabin's thread:



I don't see a problem with that headline, assuming it's Panja's own.

It's entirely possible that investigators DID want to boot City. It isn't necessarily his opinion being put forward. If he's said that he thinks it should be done, it would come down to how it was worded.

What do you think about the post above yours from that journalist, highlighting our owners ethnicity, when is this done reference the other many foreign owners in our league, casual racism at best from him, not as blatant as some, but still very much there.
 
What do you think about the post above yours from that journalist, highlighting our owners ethnicity, when is this done reference the other many foreign owners in our league, casual racism at best from him, not as blatant as some, but still very much there.

Get with the gig ffs. He's already responded to it and said he takes back what he said previously, as have I. Tariq Panja is now officially on the list of C*nt Avengers!
 
Get with the gig ffs. He's already responded to it and said he takes back what he said previously, as have I. Tariq Panja is now officially on the list of C*nt Avengers!

It's fine, if he's just working along the thread, he may not have got to 9141 when he posted - I do the same thing.
 
So much for UEFA adjudicators not making any further comment until a final announcement.

If the initial reports of a UEFA U-turn are accurate, then City's irrefutable evidence must have been compelling.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top