super_city_si
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2007
- Messages
- 53,891
FUCK YEAH!!!Apparently, the mood in the dressing room was' "Fuck UEFA, we’re in this together.
FUCK YEAH!!!Apparently, the mood in the dressing room was' "Fuck UEFA, we’re in this together.
Did you really need to write that last sentence.If we win this case, it will be better than winning any trophy, any quadruple, winning a title in the last minute. I fucking mean that. I want to see all these ****s battered and bruised like we have been over the years. I hope to god Khaldoon has got our backs here.
I've never had any doubt that part of our strategy will be evidence of UEFA setting precedents in their dealings with other clubs, it always made total sense to me.
Doubt it’ll form one of the main parts of our defence, but guess it all adds to a wider picture of us being unfairly treated.That's not a defence though. We are in deep shit if that is the way we are appealing.
This has to be fought on what we have not done, not what others have.
Hypocrisy is everywhere in society, it is overlooked when it serves a purpose.
Agree. It would just mean psg and Juve get bans too. Doesn’t help usThat's not a defence though. We are in deep shit if that is the way we are appealing.
This has to be fought on what we have not done, not what others have.
Hypocrisy is everywhere in society, it is overlooked when it serves a purpose.
To be fair , I could list your posts that state we would be signing X, Y and Z over the last few seasons . Doesn’t mean I won’t look forward to other cryptic crap coming up .Can't be proved wrong either way.
I'm sorry, but The Athletic said we would get zero punishment.
Their article is even more exposed when you see the timeline of when they stated such, yet the CAS submission and meetings were still taking place last month.
That's not a defence though. We are in deep shit if that is the way we are appealing.
This has to be fought on what we have not done, not what others have.
Hypocrisy is everywhere in society, it is overlooked when it serves a purpose.
I say let the c***s sweat and leave it till 2 minutes before the deadline runs down, then notify them. That's assuming our fax machine is a significantly better model than the rag's.
Did you really need to write that last sentence.
You fucking well know he has!
That's not a defence though. We are in deep shit if that is the way we are appealing.
This has to be fought on what we have not done, not what others have.
Hypocrisy is everywhere in society, it is overlooked when it serves a purpose.
Don’t think I’ve ever once claimed that UEFA have treated us fairly regarding FFP?What, like some kind of agenda against our club? Surely not... :-)
That's not a defence though. We are in deep shit if that is the way we are appealing.
This has to be fought on what we have not done, not what others have.
Hypocrisy is everywhere in society, it is overlooked when it serves a purpose.
FIFASaid this before but look at City's statement. CAS is not the only recourse. Where else do we go? Are we bluffing?
Think City are ready fight the legal fight and the public fight. I guess they had to be, no other choice.
Legal fight will be with CAS and in courts.
Different treatment for different teams will be part of the public offensive.
Hopefully "on the pitch" and "in the stands" fight is not affected by other distractions.
I thought HH was Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed? Whatever, it's certainly not Sheikh Mansour and the emails said HH would "arrange" the extra funding. That funding comes from Abu Dhabi, probably the Executive Council, not ADUG so it's not owner investment.The emails state 'HH' = High Highness = Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, the ruler of Abu Dhabi .
Sheikh Mansour and all the other male members of the royal family are 'HE' = His Excellency.
On that point alone there is no validity whatsoever in claims by UEFA or the hostile media that Sheikh Mansour (or ADUG) paid Etihad's sponsorship money.