UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
Actually, that article is quite sympathetic. Basically, it says all fans, including the writer, wear tinted specs.
There's been worse, but any way you look at it, it's not very complimentary of us. And it's one of a long line of articles focussing on our fan base in a negative way.

I wonder why no journo seems remotely interested in why were biting back at the media, and why we are arguing the clubs case.

It's too easy to say we're being led by the club, if they'd bothered to check many of us have argued for a long while that the club have been too soft with the media.
 
Having to hire the best lawyer in the business does set off a few alarm bells for me. If we’re so sure of our defence, why do we need a clever lawyer to present it?
I applied the same logic when appointing my solicitor for divorcing the Mrs after she had an affair. She got everything.

I’m only writing this as I can sofa surf at the weekends, it’s more difficult from my tent on Oldham Edge during the week.

Cue a SJW have a go claiming I’m mocking the homeless.
 
Having to hire the best lawyer in the business does set off a few alarm bells for me. If we’re so sure of our defence, why do we need a clever lawyer to present it?
Erm, no. The incremental cost between Pannick and A Nother QC is probably £100-200k in this case. Best play it safe, eh
 
Having to hire the best lawyer in the business does set off a few alarm bells for me. If we’re so sure of our defence, why do we need a clever lawyer to present it?
giphy.gif
 
I get that 'worrying' is a bit of a Football fan's companion, but sometimes the extremes of it are, to say the least, farcical. The club has vast resources, it has ALWAYS defended itself as being truthful at every turn and also maintained it has evidence to prove it's stance. However, in some instances, evidence is not supremely enough, it needs a bit of push, an eloquent nudge here a knowledgeable shove there...in short it needs delivering by an experienced teller, one who others look to as being accomplished in what they do...not one whose star in an ascendancy but is already out there shining brightly and has shone continuously over a period of time. To have hired the best to present and deliver our 'truth' gives a further indication that our club believe totally in their cause. No matter all that has been said, there are still those intent with siding with their niggling mate! Don't :-)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top