UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%

  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%

  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%

  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%
  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
paulchapo said:
This thread reminds me of that Aviva add where the woman is interrogating the bloke on if his door lock conforms to BSA standards. He frustratingly shouts, "I don't know!! Nobody knows!!!" I fear the same applies here, though a lot appear to know the answers, do they?
Click to expand...

It’s a good job we all know about BS3621 locks though right
 
Jazzman said:
Could it be that City is so sure of winning that they use this as a way of putting more pressure on UEFA? The amount of damages we can sue them for will just get bigger, and furthermore UEFA should be more motivated to get this resolved ASAP.
Click to expand...

The problem for UEFA if we dont ask for a suspension and there isn't a ruling before the next CL is even higher damages if we win. What would be the damages involved if we were banned but subsequently won at CAS?
 
Ardwick Green Blue said:
The problem for UEFA if we dont ask for a suspension and there isn't a ruling before the next CL is even higher damages if we win. What would be the damages involved if we were banned but subsequently won at CAS?
Click to expand...
Damages not a patch on actually playing in CL
 
Ardwick Green Blue said:
Agreed but I'd say the damages would be so big that UEFA couldn't shrug them off. Even giving us what the winners earn wouldn't get anywhere near it as I assume damage to the brand, exemplary damages and legal fees etc would be astronomical.
Click to expand...

It has been reported that clubs have an agreement with uefa that neither can claim damages against the other.

i wouldn't think damages is what the club is after, more a swift resolution.

Either way, plenty of time to request a suspension, once the adjudicators are selected.
 
Coatigan said:
It has been reported that clubs have an agreement with uefa that neither can claim damages against the other.

i wouldn't think damages is what the club is after, more a swift resolution.

Either way, plenty of time to request a suspension, once the adjudicators are selected.
Click to expand...
They also have an agreement not to disclose details of the ongoing case
 
tolmie's hairdoo said:
I'm not aware of any journos sitting on a massive expose.

The only way I could see it being the case, is if The Times or FT have been promised it by City at a time of our choosing.

Personally, if we have dirt on our rivals, I don't see any gain relying on the UK media to report it.

Airing it in court makes it legal and opens it up to the world.
Click to expand...

agreed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top