UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
The time has now come to scrap FFP in its current form. It is totally stupid that you can make a profit and fail FFP. While a club across the city can lose millions and pass FFP. This is totally beyond my comprehension.

The whole board of UEFA needs a root and branch clean sweep. Every person on a UEFA board needs to be removed and replaced. With younger blood and with those who have played the game at the highest level.

I am worried that when and if CAS clears us, that UEFA will not try again to ban us from their competitions. Those guys on both the IC and AC committees of UEFA won't try something else to get us banned. They just hate are guts they maybe even racist.
The rules will be changed or “relaxed” as soon as we’re kicked out
 
The rules will be changed or “relaxed” as soon as we’re kicked out

We will not be kicked out, banned / suspended call it what you like

After 2 years we will be allowed back in if we qualify

However if the rules are relaxed or changed it could suit us.

I would hope, and that is what always kills you, that if banned and the rules on FFP are changed our owners do what they did in 2008.

Spend, spend, spend. If they are as rich as they say then they could do as they want.

But this does depend on how the rules are changed/ relaxed

It is going to be interesting
 
The time has now come to scrap FFP in its current form. It is totally stupid that you can make a profit and fail FFP. While a club across the city can lose millions and pass FFP. This is totally beyond my comprehension.
Beyond mine as well mate, as you can't possibly fail FFP if you've made a profit.

You can however pass FFP if you've made a loss and are bleeding cash. You can breach your banking covenants and pass FFP. That (as well as other things) is why it's a nonsense.
 
We will not be kicked out, banned / suspended call it what you like

After 2 years we will be allowed back in if we qualify

However if the rules are relaxed or changed it could suit us.

I would hope, and that is what always kills you, that if banned and the rules on FFP are changed our owners do what they did in 2008.

Spend, spend, spend. If they are as rich as they say then they could do as they want.

But this does depend on how the rules are changed/ relaxed

It is going to be interesting

And if we thought of it, you can be sure UEFA have. It will be something along the lines of you can invest a multiple of your 5 year historic profit.
 
We will not be kicked out, banned / suspended call it what you like

After 2 years we will be allowed back in if we qualify

However if the rules are relaxed or changed it could suit us.

I would hope, and that is what always kills you, that if banned and the rules on FFP are changed our owners do what they did in 2008.

Spend, spend, spend. If they are as rich as they say then they could do as they want.

But this does depend on how the rules are changed/ relaxed

It is going to be interesting

But they are running a business they want to spend they want to invest in players and importantly for them infrastructure and do not want to be told what to do by people who know nothing of business let alone them or Manchester City but even without FFP we won’t ever have a team of Galaticos because they want to make money and want to be respected as to how they are doing things
 
But they are running a business they want to spend they want to invest in players and importantly for them infrastructure and do not want to be told what to do by people who know nothing of business let alone them or Manchester City but even without FFP we won’t ever have a team of Galaticos because they want to make money and want to be respected as to how they are doing things
I'm not sure we will see spending like 2008, Sheikh Mansour always wanted us to be self sufficient, which for 5 years we have, the last couple of seasons we have only signed what the board felt was needed and the academy is profitable.

If UEFA are endorsed by CAS, then It might be a different story but SM will more likely go after UEFA in the courts.
 
when we win this, I really hope city go for the bollox, tell UEFA that they have damaged the city name and go for mils from them, also tell them any more shit from them and all hell will break, then tell some clubs that we will not let it stop us from going for them as well
 
If we are cleared by CAS on all charges what should the club do next. Which I hope we are on so counts.

For me the first thing to do is go after UEFA, wring out of them as much money as we can get. Then next on the list is Der Spegeil and sue them to the point of bankruptcy. After this we start going after anybody else who has ever said anything that is either slanderous or libellous against us.
 
Could we sue der speigel if we are exonerated? They seem to be at the root of all this! Unless of course they have dirt on our enemies they’d care to share......
 
It isn’t in our long term interest to do anything publically if this case goes our way. No matter how much we as fans would love to see some.

Statement: we knew we were innocent, we move on undeterred.

Its a dodgy industry, you do your business and make your threats behind closed doors. You dont put your head up to be shot at or make public enemies
 
If we are cleared by CAS on all charges what should the club do next. Which I hope we are on so counts.

For me the first thing to do is go after UEFA, wring out of them as much money as we can get. Then next on the list is Der Spegeil and sue them to the point of bankruptcy. After this we start going after anybody else who has ever said anything that is either slanderous or libellous against us.
Do your continuous jurisprudential fantasies provoke you to earth shattering orgasms?
I'm not particularly well up on German or Swiss law, but fantasy is what you are indulging in:
- I doubt if we have a cause of action against Speigel....fair comment and all that
. - Uefa are probably immune under Swiss law from actions for damages arising from operating their rules. Even a faulty procedure unlikely to jeopardise them.
- As for others, saying stuff we don't like usually is not actionable.
City's owners are serious about all this; I doubt they share your need to sue all and sundry.
 
If we are cleared by CAS on all charges what should the club do next. Which I hope we are on so counts.

For me the first thing to do is go after UEFA, wring out of them as much money as we can get. Then next on the list is Der Spegeil and sue them to the point of bankruptcy. After this we start going after anybody else who has ever said anything that is either slanderous or libellous against us.

You’ve been contributing to this debate for sometime but you still seem to think UEFA as a whole are the enemy. They are NOT - it’s the G14 cartel clubs that are the problem. We need to win this case and side with the more positive elements of UEFA against our enemies - the G14.
 
What have they done that is illegal?

Nothing that I can see, and being a high profile investigative paper I would think their legal department is both large and very competent and unlikely to let them print stuff that would get them in much trouble.

On top of that, it just doesn't look good for the club's owners to go after a free press or be seen to be gagging papers.
 
K55 if I say something that I know is untrue then that is slanderous and I can be sued. If it is printed it then becomes libellous and can also be sued. Now whether they have the same laws in Germany and Switzerland is what I don't know.

If they do then why shouldn't we do that.
 
Nothing that I can see, and being a high profile investigative paper I would think their legal department is both large and very competent and unlikely to let them print stuff that would get them in much trouble.

On top of that, it just doesn't look good for the club's owners to go after a free press or be seen to be gagging papers.
Didnt do the family guy any harm gagging papers.
Did he then will sports not a personality of the year
 
Didnt do the family guy any harm gagging papers.
Did he then will sports not a personality of the year

Family guy isn't part of the ruling family of a country with one of the most restricted and censored press in the world.

UAE is 131st out of 180 on the press freedom index, and it's something they have been getting very public shit over for a long time. If the club start banning journalists, papers or pursuing them in courts then rightly or not, comparisons will be made. Especially with Simon Pearce at the helm.

Our other owners, the Chinese Media Capital, are allowed to operate by the state ranked 177th out of 180.

It's just not smart to draw attention to these things, you would completely overshadow any small gain from legally punishing a journo or paper.
 
K55 if I say something that I know is untrue then that is slanderous and I can be sued. If it is printed it then becomes libellous and can also be sued. Now whether they have the same laws in Germany and Switzerland is what I don't know.

If they do then why shouldn't we do that.
Mere untruth does not generally provide a cause of action for defamation. Depending on the jurisdiction, there has to be some element beyond untruth such as alleging criminal behaviour, or malice or damage.
Khaldoon is much too subtle to go round waving writs. I'm sure he will have other plans in mind.
I believe he is already arranging the purchase of tigers, lions and wild dogs. PB knows.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top