So why would they then hit us with such a severe sanction, that is what baffles me. A one year ban fine, but 2 years? And a fine? Madness
Because 2 years is the standard. If they claim we breached FFP, 2 years is the automatic punishment for that.
So why would they then hit us with such a severe sanction, that is what baffles me. A one year ban fine, but 2 years? And a fine? Madness
If there is no proper leak before Sunday, we will know City have won this.
If we are found guilty he could write...I told you so, it takes one to know one and afterall I'm a cheating ex-ping-pong ****.‘i said I’d apologise if you were cleared. You haven’t been cleared. It’s been ruled that UEFA didn’t follow due process not that you didn’t cheat’.
there you go, I’ll write it for him. The horrible snivelling knobrot
Is this the same guy who would be stood near the souvenir shop/ticket office pre match with a sandwich board/A frame round his neck?
His other heartwarming Bible message was 'prepare to meet thy maker'.
It’s entirely possible to believe that everything is on the line and that we will not receive a ban. The two aren’t mutually exclusive.Thank fuck you aren’t on the CAS tribunal.?Mind you, you are just a sad win given less than a day ago you posted “no way are we getting a ban”
I’m with Tommie, I’m more confident by the day.Haha. Mate, can I say that with each passing day I'm more convinced we're getting the full 2 years. I've got nothing to back this up except my own natural pessimism when it comes to City.
Usually there is an end of season quick tour to Sheikh Mansour in UAE if Pep, Txiki,Soriano goes there with a Carabao cup only and a 2 year CL ban there will be "blood". And if all this happens because some of these guys was just careless with some stupid emails what do you think what Mansour will think of that?
Ok then. He was a weird pedo.Say what you like about him
Remember him well. He used to always say I’ve got my seat mate, not in there and point to the stand. Up there and point to the sky.Reading some of these posts.
Anyone else remember the Dude who stood outside the Kippax every home game with "The End Is Nigh " around his neck,
For someone who doesn't 'want to think about a guilty verdict', you're spending an awful lot of time banging on about it.It’s grim. Don’t want to think about a guilty verdict. Let’s hope by Tuesday we are talking transfers, but the reality exists.
Exactly, the fallout if we do get banned is going to be hystericalSo the decision is on Monday? I can’t keep up, the pessimist in me thinks we are fucked, at first I thought we would be ok but the way 2020 is going I’m thinking not, then I’m waiting for the the call to strip us of titles etc from that period, it will be fucking open season on us.
But what was it we 'failed to cooperate on'? Was it not producing Etihads accounts (we have no right to do that), or was it perhaps not giving them full access to our internal emails? We presumably have retained the 'we will not comment on stolen emails' message, I don't think UEFA can see them unless we allow them to. I'm still convinced that UEFA have just spat the dummy out in frustration at us. Yves Leterme s denial of any leak suggests to me that they got caught out and haven't got the good grace to back off.I was pretty confident we would get off or a suspended guilty verdict.
I started listening to the price of football pod cast and now I’m bloody nervous
Before going into CAS, UEFA were confident they have a cast iron case against us and it wasn’t based solely on FFP.
Their view was city failed to cooperate with the new investigation and that’s was why the ban was 2 years and city are pinning their hopes on UEFA failed to follow their own procedures by leaking the information before we knew
I was pretty confident we would get off or a suspended guilty verdict.
I started listening to the price of football pod cast and now I’m bloody nervous
Before going into CAS, UEFA were confident they have a cast iron case against us and it wasn’t based solely on FFP.
Their view was city failed to cooperate with the new investigation and that’s was why the ban was 2 years and city are pinning their hopes on UEFA failed to follow their own procedures by leaking the information before we knew
And it is pure speculation.A case not being based solely on FFP would be odd.
For someone who doesn't 'want to think about a guilty verdict', you're spending an awful lot of time banging on about it.
I was pretty confident we would get off or a suspended guilty verdict.
I started listening to the price of football pod cast and now I’m bloody nervous
Before going into CAS, UEFA were confident they have a cast iron case against us and it wasn’t based solely on FFP.
Their view was city failed to cooperate with the new investigation and that’s was why the ban was 2 years and city are pinning their hopes on UEFA failed to follow their own procedures by leaking the information before we knew
We were offered the option of a fine in return for accepting our guilt for what was described as a "technical accounting breach". Which we refused. Hence why I'm a bit dubious about ancoats'' story a few pages back as that was seemingly a better deal than the one his mate says we agreed.