bry the guy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Aug 2012
- Messages
- 179
sorry was trying to get banned by Delaney hit the wrong keyWho’s that twunt?
Who’s that twunt?
sorry was trying to get banned by Delaney hit the wrong keyWho’s that twunt?
Who’s that twunt?
He's still here!
Zin 'messiah' Zimmer man i was trying to get banned by Delany and fucked up.fuck off
That’s nearly 100 pages since last night. Sod that.Tip for those always catching up and for the upcoming days; click on the thread title and not the latest page number and it'll bring you to the last post you read.
Shots fired from our migsy at 20 past 12 in the morning. What do we read into this one lads? Another 80 pages surely!
Maria.
Aqua Maria.
What are these strange enchantments I hear whenever your near.
He clearly has a problem with Muslim Arabs, just like a majority of people running top class football.The article from February that Delaney references at the bottom of that tweet is actually quite a decent summary of how football got itself in this mess, so decent that I can hardly believe he wrote it! It makes many valid historical points about how English football in particular became much less competitive - starting with home clubs keeping all gate receipts in the early 80s and the explosion of satellite tv in the early 90s that was a driving force in the creation of the PL and the subsequent dominance of the rags in particular.
Yet he fails to join the dots and cannot see that FFP as currently regulated simply sets those problems in stone - that the only way that clubs can break the stranglehold of the "history" clubs, both in England and Europe generally, is via large-scale investment which is where his bizarre hang-ups about "petro-states" and "sportswashing" comes into play. It seems that he prefers owners who take money out of the sport rather than those who invest money into it, the logic is so screwed that it's hard to avoid bringing racism into the argument when criticising him.
Like , you know, the brown ones.My biggest problem with Delaney, which I don't have with other supporters of FFP is that he argues in bad faith. Other people genuinely will argue that it stops another portsmouth or it keeps the playing field relatively level at the top, but Delaney has written long arguments about how that's not true.
The obvious conclusion to all his arguments about football being broken is that FFP is a terrible thing for football, it solidifies the status quo by only allowing already rich clubs to spend money, and the gap grows every year it exists...but he never reaches that conclusion because he would rather FFP exist and see United, Liverpool, Arsenal pull away from the rest than a billionaire invests in City, or Wolves, or whoever and makes them competitive because he doesn't want the wrong billionaire to get into the sport - you know, the "petro-state" ones.