UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
Bravo! That final line should have been delivered with the slap of a leather glove around his chops.
Leather?

I would do it properly.

1DWjTrVdi96fUuYwbaMyOuBSt7VNyt-1MWDB-gCoZS5yWqYH9Wa7k7tleDEYlZXOGqqyaEv0gddz0u8QeB97cUCj5VTEuIFJOgpI1ohlGDA7_zH5DngZqTp21aigBR5aMf20a9KhX55zzfWJYVA6bjDr2Q8Kg4OuaJVv
 
Little to confirm either way but what is out there seems to indicate we’ve won.

-Cheesy and Sinclair’s Tweets saying exonerated
-The usual suspects who hate us in the press are silent and some even sulking
-Pep’s confidence yesterday
-The general silence from most quarters
-De Bruyne’s agent saying he’s happy, several weeks ago KDB said he’d consider his future if upheld
-PB and another poster have both heard HH S. Mohammed gave evidence in person, that it was him that sent the money, which clears us
-Whispers of high level transfers going ahead and extensions to key players
-General confidence from City and I truly believe if we’d lost they’d be leaking it to soften the blow on Monday

The only way FFP could be effective is to introduce the "Draft" system used in American football. Salary Caps etc.
Without the investment at City we would never be able to stop the "Top Teams" drinking from the Trough that is the Champions League.
Sure there a few EPL teams with a bigger fan base and therefore an assumption is they'd get bigger Sponsorship Deals. Fact is that sponsering a team that plays arguable the most stylish attractive football has some Kudos for the sponsors brand?
Finally Barca and Real get approximately 50% of the Spanish TV money ..... That's fair is it?
 
Ironic seeing as Liverpool failed FFP in 2013 and were on the brink of failing again in 2015 before their £50 million Stanley Park FFP fraud. They certainly did 'get away with it' both times.

Can you sum up the Stanley Park instanced briefly? Not heard much about that.
 
Ironic seeing as Liverpool failed FFP in 2013 and were on the brink of failing again in 2015 before their £50 million Stanley Park FFP fraud. They certainly did 'get away with it' both times.
I must say, I’m sick of reading about this in the papers every day and, when it’s consistently on Sky, BT and the BBC it makes you feel a bit sorry for those cheeky, fun loving Scallies......
 
Ironic seeing as Liverpool failed FFP in 2013 and were on the brink of failing again in 2015 before their £50 million Stanley Park FFP fraud. They certainly did 'get away with it' both times.
Can you sum up the Stanley Park instanced briefly? Not heard much about that.
Required reading for any blue that ever has to interact with a Liverpool supporter for any reason, at any time:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/f...xpected-to-escape-fine-for-breaching-FFP.html
 
The only way FFP could be effective is to introduce the "Draft" system used in American football. Salary Caps etc.
Without the investment at City we would never be able to stop the "Top Teams" drinking from the Trough that is the Champions League.
Sure there a few EPL teams with a bigger fan base and therefore an assumption is they'd get bigger Sponsorship Deals. Fact is that sponsering a team that plays arguable the most stylish attractive football has some Kudos for the sponsors brand?
Finally Barca and Real get approximately 50% of the Spanish TV money ..... That's fair is it?
FFP could be more effective if it took a more holistic (is it safe to use that word yet?) look at clubs' financial situations.

At the moment it just looks at the P&L account yet you could have two clubs with identical revenue and bottom lines but one has loads of cash in the bank and the other could be weighed down with debt and struggling to meet the repayments. Currently FFP sees those two as equal, whereas the reality is that the latter is far more at risk than the former.
 
Can you sum up the Stanley Park instanced briefly? Not heard much about that.

I thought the details were well known but here we go. Liverpool were on the brink of failing FFP and magicked up £50 million (some sources say £35 million) in 'stadium development expenses' for the Stanley Park Project which had already been abandoned years before. They offset this against their FFP losses and UEFA accepted it despite the sum involved being rather a lot for mowing the grass a few times and maybe getting an inital blueprint knocked up.

There's an article in the Telegraph from 2015 but you might have to sign up for a free trial to read it uninterrupted.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/f...xpected-to-escape-fine-for-breaching-FFP.html
 
I thought the details were well known but here we go. Liverpool were on the brink of failing FFP and magicked up £50 million (some sources say £35 million) in 'stadium development expenses' for the Stanley Park Project which had already been abandoned years before. They offset this against their FFP losses and UEFA accepted it despite the sum involved being rather a lot for mowing the grass a few times and maybe getting an inital blueprint knocked up.

There's an article in the Telegraph from 2015 but you might have to sign up for a free trial to read it uninterrupted.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/f...xpected-to-escape-fine-for-breaching-FFP.html
As I said, people are losing their edge... ;-)
 
FFP could be more effective if it took a more holistic (is it safe to use that word yet?) look at clubs' financial situations.

At the moment it just looks at the P&L account yet you could have two clubs with identical revenue and bottom lines but one has loads of cash in the bank and the other could be weighed down with debt and struggling to meet the repayments. Currently FFP sees those two as equal, whereas the reality is that the latter is far more at risk than the former.

That's the point exactly! As far as I am aware City have no debt and if the owners walked away they would need to sell to the highest bidder. United generate a greater turnover than us but are maintaining huge debt, just like Liverpool. Our owners have also developed a world class academy and invested heavily in the local area. Hopefully the academy will produce many more Fodens in the future.
Just a thought, who was the last team to win the League with all English players? Doubt it will happen again and we'd have missed the likes of Merlin anyway.
 
That's the point exactly! As far as I am aware City have no debt and if the owners walked away they would need to sell to the highest bidder. United generate a greater turnover than us but are maintaining huge debt, just like Liverpool. Our owners have also developed a world class academy and invested heavily in the local area. Hopefully the academy will produce many more Fodens in the future.
Just a thought, who was the last team to win the League with all English players? Doubt it will happen again and we'd have missed the likes of Merlin anyway.
FFP and fair? A player may choose to get 200K a week in a country where they pay less tax so that skews Financially Fair also.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top