And why do you think any of that would concern CAS in the least?
I'm not sure I remember him. Is @brooklandsblue2.0 the one who sits in his mums bath pretending it's,a hot tub full of blokes?I'm surprised I didn't pick up on that; @brooklandsblue2.0 is normally such a noticeable poster.
No I don't but it's inconceivable that they will find out tomorrow morning so I my assumption is that they know.
I’d’ve used many more colourful adjectives to describe @brooklandsblue2.0 before “noticeable”.I'm surprised I didn't pick up on that; @brooklandsblue2.0 is normally such a noticeable poster.
I'm sure @brooklandsblue2.0 can speak for himself.Come on guys, this targeted harassment of @brooklandsblue2.0 isn’t really on.
Rules still the same, but the two cases are very different. Cant see leniency to us. If I remember correctly, Milan volunteered to step down for a year to get themselves in orderWell unless the rules have been changed since, then your assessment would be a good outcome should it come to pass. There is a precedent. Milan were banned from the Europa League by UEFA. They appealed and the court determined that the punishment was disproportionate and on those grounds, UEFA were told by CAS to review it. Milan were then reinstated and the ban never happened. Here is the link:-
https://www.standard.co.uk/sport/fo...gue-after-cas-overturn-uefa-ban-a3892826.html
I'm hungover!I’d’ve used many more colourful adjectives to describe @brooklandsblue2.0 before “noticeable”.
For what reason?It was announced weeks ago , just after the "trial" that it will be postponed to Monday.
Never forget , the law is an ass.For what it's worth, I think we are guilty of at best bending the rules, at worst breaking them. If we do 'win' it will be on a point of procedure, not the fact that we are innocent.
I think @brooklandsblue2.0 is swinging todayNo @brooklandsblue2.0 today?
I'm afraid to say that I believe football is corrupt at just about every level and while I am not suggesting that the CAS panel are susceptible to corruption, I don't think it is beyond the realms of possibility that pressure may have been brought to bear.
In cases like this, as with most of life, money wins.
For what it's worth, I think we are guilty of at best bending the rules, at worst breaking them. If we do 'win' it will be on a point of procedure, not the fact that we are innocent.
No, I think that was someone called @brooklandsblue not @brooklandsblue2.0Yes mate a page or so back. @brooklandsblue2.0 deffo posted, but I can't remember what it said now.
Are you sure - I could've sworn it was @brooklandsblue2.0No, I think that was someone called @brooklandsblue not @brooklandsblue2.0
Don't forget the Celery.I have been practicing my chelsea patter
Hello treacle
One man went to mow
My memory isn't what it was so perhaps it was @brooklandsblue2.0 after all.Are you sure - I could've sworn it was @brooklandsblue2.0
I'm afraid to say that I believe football is corrupt at just about every level and while I am not suggesting that the CAS panel are susceptible to corruption, I don't think it is beyond the realms of possibility that pressure may have been brought to bear.
In cases like this, as with most of life, money wins.
For what it's worth, I think we are guilty of at best bending the rules, at worst breaking them. If we do 'win' it will be on a point of procedure, not the fact that we are innocent.
Brilliant, just laughed out loud when I looked at the posters name.You should remove the 'm' from the front of your username.