UK far right trouble

Tbh it wasn't an opinion about whether she should be convicted for chanting or not (I'd have to hear what was chanted), it was just about proving the principle that chanting can get you locked up.
Your original point, was that they can get locked up for saying it was “Ali, not John”.

Any cases of this?

Or has your argument moved on to chanting (with a small amount of violent disorder)?
 
Winston Churchill: untried war criminal (Germany, millions of civilians killed and civilian women raped).


Margaret Thatcher: untried war criminal (Irish conflict, political prisoners, a lot of murders, guys tortured...).


Tony Blair: untried war criminal (Irak, millions of civilians murdered).


Probably along with Putin (untried war criminal, Ucraine) and within the last 80 years, these three people are the ones who have committed the most serious crimes worldwide without having been judged.


And you nevera say anything about those three people. You never fought for those three people to be imprisoned, or for them to be symbolically condemned today.

But nevertheless you became obsessed with four chavs who shouted twice in a manifestation.
Kids

Just say no to Drugs!!
 
Your original point, was that they can get locked up for saying it was “Ali, not John”.

Any cases of this?

Or has your argument moved on to chanting (with a small amount of violent disorder)?

My original point was that there has been a massive crackdown on speech and that lots of people were being locked up for chanting and some were even locked up for misnaming the attacker i.e. calling him Ali. Some people denied this. I posted multiple cases proving that denialism to be wrong. If you look back on the thread, you'll see some of the cases cited from the CPS's website, the BBC, and other sources.
 
My original point was that there has been a massive crackdown on speech and that lots of people were being locked up for chanting and some were even locked up for misnaming the attacker i.e. calling him Ali. Some people denied this. I posted multiple cases proving that denialism to be wrong. If you look back on the thread, you'll see some of the cases cited from the CPS's website, the BBC, and other sources.
But no one got locked up for misnaming the attacker did they?
 
Has anyone been charged with police assault at the airport yet that is a disgrace which should have never been allowed to drag on like this
a young pc doing her job and gets assaulted broken nose etc all on camera where’s the justice here

Nope. The powers that be are hoping this will just go away in time and be forgotten about.

They quelled any protests of complaint with jail time for anyone that dared speak up, i dont think ‘they’ have the bollocks or the man power to take on the asian community if they mobilise in any numbers
 
Nope. The powers that be are hoping this will just go away in time and be forgotten about.

They quelled any protests of complaint with jail time for anyone that dared speak up, i dont think ‘they’ have the bollocks or the man power to take on the asian community if they mobilise in any numbers
I doubt its anything as sinister as that. The police sent a file of evidence to the CPS in September I think? Maybe a bit earlier. The CPS take an inordinate amount of time to review stuff and make charging decisions and have a clear tactic, which they deny to be the case but clearly is, of sending back multiple action plans to police with pointless issues or pedantic bullshit, in order to buy them time and cause delay so that they can manage their workload in their time and at their own pace. It takes ages, and they are seemingly unaccountable for it. The CPS are, unfailingly, cunts, and it prolongs the investigative process with no comeback on them ever.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.