UKIP...

[blueonblue]

SJWs were self declared clowns who took it upon themselves to try and organise de-platforming of things and people they did not agree with in the name of "Social justice" and described themselves as warriors in the fight to rid the world of some perceived evil or other, it became a p*ss take term they did not get for a long time.

 

[Damocles]

You’ve presumably got to be a bit of a prick to think that people wanting social justice is a bad thing?

It's their definition of social justice that's the problem. Everybody wants social justice. What the people himself label as SJWs want is closer to minority rule.

They're professionally oppressed, to give it a different terminology.

 

[BobKowalski]

It's their definition of social justice that's the problem. Everybody wants social justice. What the people himself label as SJWs want is closer to minority rule.

They're professionally oppressed, to give it a different terminology.

For those whose rights as a class or a group are recognised and protected being asked to share those rights on an equal basis is often seen as persecution, injustice and even as ‘minority rule’.

 

[Damocles]

For those whose rights as a class or a group are recognised and protected being asked to share those rights on an equal basis is often seen as persecution, injustice and even as ‘minority rule’.

Yes we've all heard the "equality is oppression for white people" cliche Bob. Most of us are smart enough to see it for the rhetorical nonsense it is though rather than base an entire political ideology on it

 

[BobKowalski]

Yes we've all heard the "equality is oppression for white people" cliche Bob. Most of us are smart enough to see it for the rhetorical nonsense it is though rather than base an entire political ideology on it

I didn’t specifically mention white people. You mentioned white people. The group or class in question can be any protected ethnicity, sex or whatever. Those with rights do not share those rights without a fight. It was ever thus.

 

[Metal Biker]

I didn’t specifically mention white people. You mentioned white people. The group or class in question can be any protected ethnicity, sex or whatever. Those with rights do not share those rights without a fight. It was ever thus.

So which group were you referring to when you said "for those whose rights are shared and protected being asked to share those rights"? Which group is currenty being asked to "share rights" in your opinion?

 

[SWP's back]

I didn’t specifically mention white people. You mentioned white people.

Yea it’s amazing how Damocles managed to read between the lines.

 

[BobKowalski]

Yea it’s amazing how Damocles managed to read between the lines.

Which is reflection on who exactly?

I said class or group as it’s a general observation. You or anybody else want to bring your own baggage into the conversation then knock yourself out but it’s your baggage not mine.

 

[SWP's back]

Which is reflection on who exactly?

I said class or group as it’s a general observation. You or anybody else want to bring your own baggage into the conversation then knock yourself out but it’s your baggage not mine.

To whom were you referring?

 

[I'm With Stupid]

He was obviously talking about Japanese men, who it recently emerged were having their scores artificially increased by a few top Japanese medical universities in order to favour them over the women who were actually scoring higher on the entrance exams. ;)