You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
M
M
mat
Guest
Let the fuckers delusions of granduer reach the stratospheric heights we know they can reach and enjoy the crash when it comes.
AustinBlue
Well-Known Member
I didn't mention Mkhitaryan or any number of players from either side. My point stands.No mention of Fernandinho who can play very well absolutely anywhere we put him with CM as his best position? Also if the new leaner Yaya is as sharp and refreshed as he looks for the next season(fingers crossed) then forget about it he's the player Pogba wants to be as good as IMO.
moenchengladbach blau
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2006
- Messages
- 1,188
They're all giddy in work again. First trophy etc, etc , etc.......
The headline in the Fail was 'ZLATAN WINS HIS 41ST TROPHY!'.
Talk about a ideal being made about a non event but no wonder fans get giddy over a charity friendly.
Last edited:
feedmpenzaandhewillscore
Well-Known Member
The headline is the Fail was 'ZLATAN WINS HIS 41ST TROPHY!'.
Talk about a ideal being made about a non event but no wonder fans get giddy over a charity friendly.
Because the rags and their fan base are a bunch of needy fuckers. They knew they would get left behind if they kept with LVG when we appointed Pep. So they appointed a coach who got sacked from his last job for causing a melt down after a title winning season as an answer to Pep.
They knew they have a very poor squad but the money men want marketability over actual ability.
They knew they had to show they could compete in the transfer market so they entered a bidding war no one else wanted to get involved in. Bale helped deliver two champions league titles to Madrid for less than Pogba, can you see Pogba bringing European success to a club that can't consistently qualify for the champions league?
Let their needy paranoid fan base enjoy the open top bus parade, they never signed up for the situation where City consistently finish above them. Any glimmer of hope they will cling to hoping the good times are back. Fingers crossed we can crush them into the ground and I think we have the man in charge to do that.
moenchengladbach blau
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Oct 2006
- Messages
- 1,188
Because the rags and their fan base are a bunch of needy fuckers. They knew they would get left behind if they kept with LVG when we appointed Pep. So they appointed a coach who got sacked from his last job for causing a melt down after a title winning season as an answer to Pep.
They knew they have a very poor squad but the money men want marketability over actual ability.
They knew they had to show they could compete in the transfer market so they entered a bidding war no one else wanted to get involved in. Bale helped deliver two champions league titles to Madrid for less than Pogba, can you see Pogba bringing European success to a club that can't consistently qualify for the champions league?
Let their needy paranoid fan base enjoy the open top bus parade, they never signed up for the situation where City consistently finish above them. Any glimmer of hope they will cling to hoping the good times are back. Fingers crossed we can crush them into the ground and I think we have the man in charge to do that.
Uncross your fingers so we can give the rags and media a good double V sign.
M
M
mat
Guest
They're are the Stretford dippers. No wonder they hate them so much as they have the same mentality in so many ways.Because the rags and their fan base are a bunch of needy fuckers. They knew they would get left behind if they kept with LVG when we appointed Pep. So they appointed a coach who got sacked from his last job for causing a melt down after a title winning season as an answer to Pep.
They knew they have a very poor squad but the money men want marketability over actual ability.
They knew they had to show they could compete in the transfer market so they entered a bidding war no one else wanted to get involved in. Bale helped deliver two champions league titles to Madrid for less than Pogba, can you see Pogba bringing European success to a club that can't consistently qualify for the champions league?
Let their needy paranoid fan base enjoy the open top bus parade, they never signed up for the situation where City consistently finish above them. Any glimmer of hope they will cling to hoping the good times are back. Fingers crossed we can crush them into the ground and I think we have the man in charge to do that.
Tricky Dickys Right Foot Shot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Dec 2008
- Messages
- 10,553
Seen a lot on the twitterverse that a lot of United fans are saying they got the better deal out of Pogba then we have from Stones and Sterling?
They've got an extremely good player for a big transfer fee, but on the terms of who got the better deal?
Well, Stones and Sterling are two players we've never had, two players we desperately needed to strengthen that position, and two players we don't currently own with that amount of potential, so a combined total of £91.5M (potentially rising to a combined total of £99M based on add ons), then you think fair enough it's a big investment on two players for strengthening your squad.
Now as for Pogba, he's obviously been the name on everyone's radar, he's excelled at Juventus and made people take notice so you'd think £89M was unavoidable? However this was a player united allowed to leave for £800,000, a player who felt at the time he was ready for team action, but instead they brought Scholes out of retirement and pushed Pogba back into the reserves....
"Paul Scholes had retired, Darren Fletcher was injured. There was no one left to play in midfield. And I was training and I was beginning to get better bit by bit and the coach never stopped telling me, 'You're this far'.
"And I didn't understand. This far away from what? Playing? From having some playing time? From getting on the field? Or what?
"And there was Rafael in midfield and I was disgusted. I was disgusted and I didn't get on either."
Now they've resigned a player who showed this potential 5 years ago for £89M, money they could have easily avoided to spend... so to say they got the better deal is a stretch depending on which way you look at it.... ability wise yes they got the better player for the position he plays in, but for overall what it's cost them for one player, a player which they already owned 5 years ago? It's debatable.
They've got an extremely good player for a big transfer fee, but on the terms of who got the better deal?
Well, Stones and Sterling are two players we've never had, two players we desperately needed to strengthen that position, and two players we don't currently own with that amount of potential, so a combined total of £91.5M (potentially rising to a combined total of £99M based on add ons), then you think fair enough it's a big investment on two players for strengthening your squad.
Now as for Pogba, he's obviously been the name on everyone's radar, he's excelled at Juventus and made people take notice so you'd think £89M was unavoidable? However this was a player united allowed to leave for £800,000, a player who felt at the time he was ready for team action, but instead they brought Scholes out of retirement and pushed Pogba back into the reserves....
"Paul Scholes had retired, Darren Fletcher was injured. There was no one left to play in midfield. And I was training and I was beginning to get better bit by bit and the coach never stopped telling me, 'You're this far'.
"And I didn't understand. This far away from what? Playing? From having some playing time? From getting on the field? Or what?
"And there was Rafael in midfield and I was disgusted. I was disgusted and I didn't get on either."
Now they've resigned a player who showed this potential 5 years ago for £89M, money they could have easily avoided to spend... so to say they got the better deal is a stretch depending on which way you look at it.... ability wise yes they got the better player for the position he plays in, but for overall what it's cost them for one player, a player which they already owned 5 years ago? It's debatable.
http://www.squawka.com/news/revealed-the-190m-cost-of-manchester-uniteds-deal-for-paul-pogba/742867
squawka says that the 89m doesn't include agents 20% , so that's really 106m, plus the add-ons. so 110m should be the stated cost of the transfer at all times when referring to it.
squawka says that the 89m doesn't include agents 20% , so that's really 106m, plus the add-ons. so 110m should be the stated cost of the transfer at all times when referring to it.
Tricky Dickys Right Foot Shot
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Dec 2008
- Messages
- 10,553
http://www.squawka.com/news/revealed-the-190m-cost-of-manchester-uniteds-deal-for-paul-pogba/742867
squawka says that the 89m doesn't include agents 20% , so that's really 106m, plus the add-ons. so 110m should be the stated cost of the transfer at all times when referring to it.
United aren't paying the agent fees though
- Status
- Not open for further replies.