crazyg
Well-Known Member
Yet we never get those favourable decisions from those same "weak and incompetent" refs, do we?
Again, I wonder why?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
United 2016/17
- Thread starter Mikejl
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Again, I wonder why?
Yet we never get those favourable decisions from those same "weak and incompetent" refs, do we?
Again, I wonder why?
Maybe you should watch the 3rd goal again yesterday.
Clear foul from Otemendi to start the play, goes right through the Striker.
M
M
mat
Guest
I think it's just taken as read now. I'm sure Sky will have a trophy prepared for them should they need it for an end of season documentary.But the SCUM in 6th should make the joke thread don't you think?
crazyg
Well-Known Member
Well done. You found ONE foul that the referee didn't give against us in one match to prove your point!Maybe you should watch the 3rd goal again yesterday.
Clear foul from Otemendi to start the play, goes right through the Striker.
I'll raise you the pull back on Silva and the assault on Aguero that the referee ignored (one worthy of a yellow, the other a red (imo) ) to prove mine!
Your original point was that there was no corruption in the game, despite the same clubs being the beneficiaries of decisions,which you acknowledge, to the detriment of others. That, to me, is corruption if it happens on a regular basis - it's nothing to do with weak refereeing.
Well done. You found ONE foul that the referee didn't give against us in one match to prove your point!
I'll raise you the pull back on Silva and the assault on Aguero that the referee ignored (one worthy of a yellow, the other a red (imo) ) to prove mine!
Your original point was that there was no corruption in the game, despite the same clubs being the beneficiaries of decisions,which you acknowledge, to the detriment of others. That, to me, is corruption if it happens on a regular basis - it's nothing to do with weak refereeing.
I'm convinced, the Aguero moment must have been staged. The corruption runs deep, both Manure and Liverpool have conceded more penalties this season than us and we've had 5 more than Manure.
If there's corruption who's paying the bribes?
prestonibbo_mcfc
Well-Known Member
I'm convinced, the Aguero moment must have been staged. The corruption runs deep, both Manure and Liverpool have conceded more penalties this season than us and we've had 5 more than Manure.
If there's corruption who's paying the bribes?
Come on. That proves nothing. We've had a few stonewallers denied too.
Come on. That proves nothing. We've had a few stonewallers denied too.
For sure we have, I'd wager the RAGS and Dippers would say exactly the same.
I just don't get why anyone who thinks there is widespread corruption in the league bothers watching it? It that was my belief I'd jack it in.
crazyg
Well-Known Member
I'm not even deigning to make a reply. It's quite a good WUM, by the way.Come on. That proves nothing. We've had a few stonewallers denied too.
If only more people were convinced so easily, there wouldn't be 659m rag supporters!
nmc
Well-Known Member
Well done. You found ONE foul that the referee didn't give against us in one match to prove your point!
I'll raise you the pull back on Silva and the assault on Aguero that the referee ignored (one worthy of a yellow, the other a red (imo) ) to prove mine!
Your original point was that there was no corruption in the game, despite the same clubs being the beneficiaries of decisions,which you acknowledge, to the detriment of others. That, to me, is corruption if it happens on a regular basis - it's nothing to do with weak refereeing.
How Bertrand didn't get a yellow for going through the back of Kun (studs up) only the Ref will ever know.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.