SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 90,606
Would you prefer a zero to be added to those numbers so you can enjoy them G?Their copywriters are 10 year olds writing for 8 year olds.
Would you prefer a zero to be added to those numbers so you can enjoy them G?Their copywriters are 10 year olds writing for 8 year olds.
Indeed.Well, the news will be lets not focus on the dive, what a world class pen by Shrek. Cheating barstards
Yes we do, we buy all our success without earning money the right way.At least we don't have to cheat to win games
i actually think LVG is happy ,as in THIS is the way he plays and winning 1-0 with a clean sheet is his erm. Philosophy
Well, the news will be lets not focus on the dive, what a world class pen by Shrek. Cheating barstards
Wrong,it's not a fucking joke,it's corrupt pure and simple...How was that a penalty?
Fallen for the most ridiculous dive and we can't get stonewall penalties like Jesus' on Wednesday?
It's a fucking joke.
As long they keep their target market happy that's all that counts and you're obviously gagging for the product.Would you prefer a zero to be added to those numbers so you can enjoy them G?
nah, he took him on the shin - nailed on sadly.
maybe but it was the right call, you need to see it from the ref's angle - no protests from the yorkies.Wrong,it's not a fucking joke,it's corrupt pure and simple...
Wrong,it's not a fucking joke,it's corrupt pure and simple...
obviously.As long they keep their target market happy that's all that counts and you're obviously gagging for the product.
If he played for Palace or Bournemouth you wouldn't have even heard of him n
Howard Webb says it was 100% correct so that settles it!he did dive , but there was a slight contact and he took full advantage...difference is when we have clear cut penalties , it ain't given