manimanc
Well-Known Member
I mean what a twat.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
United thread 2019/20
- Thread starter Ric
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
I mean what a twat.
Trevor Morley's Tache
Well-Known Member
The resultant effect of venereal disease?More drip?....I'm glad I don't know what that means.
MichaelFrontzeck'sBathroom
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Jul 2014
- Messages
- 3,564
- Team supported
- Manchester City F.C.
More drip?....I'm glad I don't know what that means.
He's definitely a drip alright
Picking up bits from different reports to somehow guess what is really happening.
Inter Milan will match his United salary for his first year instead of a (free agent) signing fee. The two remaining years will be at a much lower level.
Therefore, Sanchez will only be losing part of his high United wage for one year.
To compensate the difference, United will pay him the rest.
So if he was on the minimum quoted £420k per week = £22m per year
Assuming he would now be on 120k per week (after the first year) = £6.3m per year
Even though these are the lowest possible figures as we know he was on more per week than £420k, it would still mean United having to pay around £16m. I suspect over £20m.
We will have to await their annually figures to reveal what the real figure is. By then nobody will care, and for now it is being sold as shrewd business somehow. Now argue that the press coverage of certain teams isn't biased!!!
Inter Milan will match his United salary for his first year instead of a (free agent) signing fee. The two remaining years will be at a much lower level.
Therefore, Sanchez will only be losing part of his high United wage for one year.
To compensate the difference, United will pay him the rest.
So if he was on the minimum quoted £420k per week = £22m per year
Assuming he would now be on 120k per week (after the first year) = £6.3m per year
Even though these are the lowest possible figures as we know he was on more per week than £420k, it would still mean United having to pay around £16m. I suspect over £20m.
We will have to await their annually figures to reveal what the real figure is. By then nobody will care, and for now it is being sold as shrewd business somehow. Now argue that the press coverage of certain teams isn't biased!!!
Picking up bits from different reports to somehow guess what is really happening.
Inter Milan will match his United salary for his first year instead of a (free agent) signing fee. The two remaining years will be at a much lower level.
Therefore, Sanchez will only be losing part of his high United wage for one year.
To compensate the difference, United will pay him the rest.
So if he was on the minimum quoted £420k per week = £22m per year
Assuming he would now be on 120k per week (after the first year) = £6.3m per year
Even though are the lowest possible figures as we know he was on more per week than £420k, it would still mean United having to pay around £16m.
We will have to await their annually figures to reveal what the real some is. By then nobody will care, and for now it is being sold as shrewd business somehow. Now argue that the press coverage of certain teams isn't biased!!!
570k a week he is on unless that with bonuses. Bottom line the scum haven’t saved 40m that’s utter lies they’ve be paying him of around 25/30m
At my age, I've run out of drip.More drip?....I'm glad I don't know what that means.
Don’t forget his loyalty bonus which he would most likely be entitled to if he hadn’t requested a transfer.....all just far too funny.There’s no way that a player would agree to settle two full years of a very lucrative contract for a "small pay-off".
Any professional worth his salt would demand the full value of the remaining months left.
570k a week he is on unless that with bonuses. Bottom line the scum haven’t saved 40m that’s utter lies they’ve be paying him of around 25/30m
Nobody knows yet.
The main thing not being reported is that Mikafin was traded in for him to Arsenal.
Mika's current value at the time was £35m.
United paying Sanchez £20m plus not receiving a fee back which would normally be around at least £35m, means the true cost of getting him off the books is nearer £55m.
Saying your saving £40-50m in wages for a player not playing for you for the next two years is fantasy accounting.
The true cost of this demonstration to City that they were bigger/better is nearer:
£35m signing fee (Mikafins true swap value)
£52m Two years wages at United (including all bonuses)
£18m subsidising wages at Milan for one year
£20m "small fee" to get him to leave.
Total = £125m (Oh Sanchez i think i love you! PMSL!)
The only way the press being technically correct is full contract costs:
5 years wages at £26m = £130m
£35m true cost of signing him = £35m
Total = £165m (with zero sell on in two years)
£165m minus £125m already paid out to get rid = Saving £40m!
Blueboy73
Well-Known Member
Does anyone remember the guy that used to be on Iraqi TV during the Gulf War spouting bull shit propaganda?
Has he landed a job as a sports reporter in the British press or Rag PR officer?
Some of the whoppers in the press today about offloading Sanchez and what a masterstroke they've pulled is in a par with the guff he used to spout
Has he landed a job as a sports reporter in the British press or Rag PR officer?
Some of the whoppers in the press today about offloading Sanchez and what a masterstroke they've pulled is in a par with the guff he used to spout
Chemical Ali. Plays for Spurs now, I believe.Does anyone remember the guy that used to be on Iraqi TV during the Gulf War spouting bull shit propaganda?
Has he landed a job as a sports reporter in the British press or Rag PR officer?
Some of the whoppers in the press today about offloading Sanchez and what a masterstroke they've pulled is in a par with the guff he used to spout
- Status
- Not open for further replies.