United thread 2019/20

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I didn't know this and sure there are many others who don't. It wasn't too long ago celebs were outed for tax avoidance yet this is probably one of the biggest cases not widely publicised.I am sure it is probably legal but immoral. I am sure Dan Roan/Harris etc will take it up.
These taxes alone would probably pay 10 times over for school meals over the summer

And that was the point I was making about rashford which has now been moved. He wrote to the Government saying they should do something, all the while the club he plays for uses a tax dodge to avoid their moral duty.
 
From our friends, the Internet.
United's F-1 filing with the SEC describes its real corporate structure. United is now officially based in the Cayman Islands, and the football club itself is a shell corporation. Technically, United's new address is c/o Walkers Corporate Services, Walker House, 87 Mary Street, George Town, Grand Cayman, KY 1-9001, Cayman Islands.
The company based there is called Red Football, which owns Manchester United plc (Cayman), which owns Red Football Holdings Limited (UK), which owns Red Football Shareholder Limited (UK), which owns Red Football Joint Venture Limited (UK), which owns Red Football Junior Limited (UK) and Manchester United Limited (UK), and "various operating subsidiaries."
Obviously, this was done for tax avoidance purposes.

By the way the last line is from the internet not me.
No wonder they didn't go for Furlough - Apparently the Cayman Islands won't cover 80% of an employee's wage.
 
No wonder they didn't go for Furlough - Apparently the Cayman Islands won't cover 80% of an employee's wage.

You also have to ask why there are so many different companies. I grew up with Manchester United FC as my local rival team. It was one identity.
Why is there …..Red Football, which owns Manchester United plc (Cayman), which owns Red Football Holdings Limited (UK), which owns Red Football Shareholder Limited (UK), which owns Red Football Joint Venture Limited (UK), which owns Red Football Junior Limited (UK) and Manchester United Limited (UK), and "various operating subsidiaries."

Do they in fact pay any UK tax for anything ? Is anyone going to ask them via newspaper or online media ?
Can you imagine the UK taxman trying to find his way through that lot to get an answer as to why 50 million of gate receipts doesn't incur any UK tax. (They may do but you get my point)
 
It's the same old story with them, no other way around it - they are being protected.
Football is big business: the turnover in the Prem is absolutely vast. Way more than the old days of the 1st Division in the 60's and early 70's. In a sense, the Premier League is now like Hollywood, doesn't matter if the films nowadays are piles of CGI crap, as long as they bring the money in the suits are happy. The same with both the rags and the dippers, treated by the media and football's governing bodies as beyond reproach, above criticism.
If the rags are screwing the tax system, sweep it all under the Axminster and turn the other way. If the dippers want to hack into another club's computer system, well, that's okay - keep quiet and it will all blow over eventually.

And until someone in a position of power sets up an independent body to look into the affairs of football in this country, the two red clubs will continue to fuck everybody else over in the pursuit of more money.
 
It's the same old story with them, no other way around it - they are being protected.
Football is big business: the turnover in the Prem is absolutely vast. Way more than the old days of the 1st Division in the 60's and early 70's. In a sense, the Premier League is now like Hollywood, doesn't matter if the films nowadays are piles of CGI crap, as long as they bring the money in the suits are happy. The same with both the rags and the dippers, treated by the media and football's governing bodies as beyond reproach, above criticism.
If the rags are screwing the tax system, sweep it all under the Axminster and turn the other way. If the dippers want to hack into another club's computer system, well, that's okay - keep quiet and it will all blow over eventually.

And until someone in a position of power sets up an independent body to look into the affairs of football in this country, the two red clubs will continue to fuck everybody else over in the pursuit of more money.

There was a major inquiry into football governance in 2011
See this link:

https://www.parliament.uk/business/...rt-committee/news/football-governance-report/

It was set up following allegations of corruption in football ownership, bung culture etc, and concern over debts and clubs going bust. But like all these inquiries most of its sensible recommendations have been ignored or watered down. This country's way of tackling corruption in all walks of life such as football, the banking sector, politics, the media, etc etc....is just to brush it under the carpet.
 
Last edited:
From our friends, the Internet.
United's F-1 filing with the SEC describes its real corporate structure. United is now officially based in the Cayman Islands, and the football club itself is a shell corporation. Technically, United's new address is c/o Walkers Corporate Services, Walker House, 87 Mary Street, George Town, Grand Cayman, KY 1-9001, Cayman Islands.
The company based there is called Red Football, which owns Manchester United plc (Cayman), which owns Red Football Holdings Limited (UK), which owns Red Football Shareholder Limited (UK), which owns Red Football Joint Venture Limited (UK), which owns Red Football Junior Limited (UK) and Manchester United Limited (UK), and "various operating subsidiaries."
Obviously, this was done for tax avoidance purposes.

By the way the last line is from the internet not me.


Excellent post. The internet quote about tax avoidance is interesting. Tax avoidance is legal and can be done through taxation experts on the payroll in the US and/or the UK. There is no reason why any law abiding person or organisation would have a confidential account in the ultra secretive Cayman Islands' banking system for legal tax avoidance. The whole purpose of having one is to facilitate illegal tax evasion and money laundering. That's the simple reason why the Mafia and international criminals also have bank accounts in the Cayman Islands.
 
Excellent post. The internet quote about tax avoidance is interesting. Tax avoidance is legal and can be done through taxation experts on the payroll in the US and/or the UK. There is no reason why any law abiding person or organisation would have a confidential account in the ultra secretive Cayman Islands' banking system for legal tax avoidance. The whole purpose of having one is to facilitate illegal tax evasion and money laundering. That's the simple reason why the Mafia and international criminals also have bank accounts in the Cayman Islands.

and yet our wonderful media who have unearthed such scandals as Kyle Walker driving to his sisters for a kebab (or whatever it was) haven't manged to do an investigation into what they are doing and why.
 
And that was the point I was making about rashford which has now been moved. He wrote to the Government saying they should do something, all the while the club he plays for uses a tax dodge to avoid their moral duty.
Rashford is no more responsible for the rags' tax avoidance than we are for AD's human rights failings.
 
It's a wonderful thing he has done , but I wish Silly Sally would just get on with giving him a BJ instead of flirting with him every morning on BBC breakfast !
 
I woke a bit early and caught the back end of the BBC rolling news. The female presenter was doing a good job dealing with a lot of matters and interviews.
Then came an item about the football starting again and after a short intro she began a remote interview with a bloke described as a football super fan. Pretty much straightaway she mention in reverential abd almost hushed tones that he was a fan of 'Man.....Yewwww'. It sounded comical but soon they started talked harmless bollocks about how much he had missed football and she asked what he thought of the fan photos and canned crowd noise. He replied something like it wasn't the same as the real thing but it would help.
Finally she asked where he would watch United's first match. He replied because of the time he and most others would not be able to watch in bars as usual so he would watch at home.
I should mention at this point that the superfan talking of atmosphere in grounds was in Bangkok. YCNMIU.
I was wondering why the BBC were showing this ridiculous interview with a pleasant presenter and an amiable idiot superfan when the Breakfast show started. It seems the whole BBC effort was being used for Silly Sally in the brightest red dress imaginable announcing how she in a role as King maker and Saint Marcus had changed government policy on their own.
It wasnt a dream and l didnt make it up but l dread to think what the build up to the rags first match will be like.
 
Rashford is no more responsible for the rags' tax avoidance than we are for AD's human rights failings.

You have joined 2 arguments together there and apologies if I don't reply to it. To do so would derail the thread and risk me getting a ban.
 
I woke a bit early and caught the back end of the BBC rolling news. The female presenter was doing a good job dealing with a lot of matters and interviews.
Then came an item about the football starting again and after a short intro she began a remote interview with a bloke described as a football super fan. Pretty much straightaway she mention in reverential abd almost hushed tones that he was a fan of 'Man.....Yewwww'. It sounded comical but soon they started talked harmless bollocks about how much he had missed football and she asked what he thought of the fan photos and canned crowd noise. He replied something like it wasn't the same as the real thing but it would help.
Finally she asked where he would watch United's first match. He replied because of the time he and most others would not be able to watch in bars as usual so he would watch at home.
I should mention at this point that the superfan talking of atmosphere in grounds was in Bangkok. YCNMIU.
I was wondering why the BBC were showing this ridiculous interview with a pleasant presenter and an amiable idiot superfan when the Breakfast show started. It seems the whole BBC effort was being used for Silly Sally in the brightest red dress imaginable announcing how she in a role as King maker and Saint Marcus had changed government policy on their own.
It wasnt a dream and l didnt make it up but l dread to think what the build up to the rags first match will be like.

Also how the hell do the BBC find a fan in Bangkok ? the cynic in me would say that the Rags are feeding the info directly into the BBC....

'Today Silly Sally I would like you to do a piece on Sir Marcus and then tomorrow we will Segway into a super fan, I will send the details of the link over in an email.'
To which Silly Sally replies 'Thank you Mr Woodward that will be great'
 
Also how the hell do the BBC find a fan in Bangkok ? the cynic in me would say that the Rags are feeding the info directly into the BBC....

'Today Silly Sally I would like you to do a piece on Sir Marcus and then tomorrow we will Segway into a super fan, I will send the details of the link over in an email.'
To which Silly Sally replies 'Thank you Mr Woodward that will be great'
It was bizarre seeing the words 'Bangkok' and 'football super fan' on the screen together as yhey talked about the restart of gootball in this country. I suspect the Bbc also use that clip for the World Service but how do you become a super fan watching in bars or at home?
Silly Sally had her bestest reddest dress on but it was missing the Chevrolet slogan though.
 
United will set the OFFICIAL PREMIER LEAGUE record for empty seats when they play their next home game :-)

Keep that one in your back pocket for next time one of them starts chatting shit about attendances - like one of my 'mates' tried tonight.... ;-)
Less there than on 85 minutes of the sick swan - highly doubtful..............
 
It's the same old story with them, no other way around it - they are being protected.
Football is big business: the turnover in the Prem is absolutely vast. Way more than the old days of the 1st Division in the 60's and early 70's. In a sense, the Premier League is now like Hollywood, doesn't matter if the films nowadays are piles of CGI crap, as long as they bring the money in the suits are happy. The same with both the rags and the dippers, treated by the media and football's governing bodies as beyond reproach, above criticism.
If the rags are screwing the tax system, sweep it all under the Axminster and turn the other way. If the dippers want to hack into another club's computer system, well, that's okay - keep quiet and it will all blow over eventually.

And until someone in a position of power sets up an independent body to look into the affairs of football in this country, the two red clubs will continue to fuck everybody else over in the pursuit of more money.
And,on the back of that,im sure Sheff utd fans will be licking their lips in anticipation at the enquiry into their disallowed goal at villa park which would have took them above utd in the league/ race for champions league football..
Var not working.apparently or some other BS reason.i wonder who the ref was?
I wonder who the var official was.neither have been mentioned repeatedly by the Football is Fixed website as being corrupt....

Makes you think back to our trip to Anfield,var not working ,Pep going mad,sky sports cover up...and still no reported outcome to our clubs complaint of a certain refs handling of the game.

Yes folks..Football is back....the stench is over-whelming.
 
Ole saying Pogba one of the best Midfielder's in the world? No doubt Pogba is a decent player, but he only plays when he wants to, he is a Prima dona. KDB a level above.
 
Ole is targeting a top three spot, according to the Times today. The media are working themselves up into a frenzy of excitement about Pogba coming back.
If Utd continue to get help from VAR etc., you never know. Not possible, surely.
Is it?
 
Also how the hell do the BBC find a fan in Bangkok ? the cynic in me would say that the Rags are feeding the info directly into the BBC....

'Today Silly Sally I would like you to do a piece on Sir Marcus and then tomorrow we will Segway into a super fan, I will send the details of the link over in an email.'
To which Silly Sally replies 'Thank you Mr Woodward that will be great'

Well done to the lad but it did appear at times it was a BBC campaign using Rashford as the figure head.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top