It doesn't surprise me at all. Whenever I watch United it is highly unusual for the opposition not to be the better side, or at the very least look very threatening. Clearly results wise, United go on to get the points in many of these games, but very rarely do United look significantly the better side.
Doesn't surprise me, either. They'll struggle for 80 minutes and clearly can't string anything together, but, hey ho, come 85 there's a nothing free kick on the edge of the box!!
Strange stat for united…mainly for nerdy types such as myself.
There are a number of ranking sites of the internet and the two best respected are 538 and Clubelo.
They both measure slightly different things. Clubelo is purely results based so win and your rating will go up lose and you go down. 538 is based on performance and result so if you perform better than expected the rating goes up and vice versa. It uses underlying performance statistics, strips the luck out and is a better predictor of what will happen than Clubelo.
As you would expect the two sets of rankings produce similar results particularly at the top with sides usually within 5 places of each other…except united.
Clubelo has united 9th while 538 has them 25th….that’s a big difference. It’s not the only one but it’s the stand out one near the top.
It basically suggests that united are getting results they don’t deserve and that their “luck” is keeping them in the top 4. One for the conspiracy theorists?!
538 has united finishing 6th in the PL based on performance, points gained so far and remaining fixtures.
I have a feeling that they will finish 4th…funny that.
ABC News is your trusted source on political news stories and videos. Get the latest coverage and analysis on everything from the Trump presidency, Senate, House and Supreme Court.
ABC News is your trusted source on political news stories and videos. Get the latest coverage and analysis on everything from the Trump presidency, Senate, House and Supreme Court.
I think I misinterpreted the sites methodology though. I previously read it as the match result not mattering, just the relative positions. Whereas it is about the result and the relative positions.
Ralf (from memory) was 10th on the all time list when he was appointed, where he remains.
Remember to scroll down past number 1, all the way to number 29.... (whilst bearing in mind the site's phrase 'more recent matches are more heavily weighted, and remembering position number 2 for any Ferguson apologists you happen to mention the fact to)
It doesn't surprise me at all. Whenever I watch United it is highly unusual for the opposition not to be the better side, or at the very least look very threatening. Clearly results wise, United go on to get the points in many of these games, but very rarely do United look significantly the better side.
As I mentioned previously the peculiar thing is the games where united actually do look ok and have plenty of possession and chances are usually the games they don't end up winning... all their wins come in the games where the opposition look clearly the better side and create more chances but then get sucker punched by united grabbing a fluky undeserved winner from their only shot on target.
Don't forget they will absolutely not want anyone turning up to a game or being interviewed in a Greenwood shirt now, so absolutely makes sense for them.
Even worse should some sections of the crowd during a game, or fans on social media, decide to take up the 'free our player' cause and the club similarly could find themselves in an uncomfortable position. Best to get the shirts binned an replaced.
Spotted this morning on Facebook, bravo if it originated on here.
"They should have got Bruce in full time, She was available and with her work on antiques roadshow, Fiona might have been able to get the most out of cavanni and Ronaldo
Man Utd top league of transfer losses with negative spend of 1bn euros in last 10 years
Manchester United have the biggest transfer losses in Europe in the last decade, according to Swiss-based research institute, CIES Football Observatory.
Since 2012 United have a negative net spend of more than one billion euros, more than rivals Manchester City.
The study revealed that the Red Devils have spent 1.545bn euros on transfers, making 470m euros back in player sales.
I think I misinterpreted the sites methodology though. I previously read it as the match result not mattering, just the relative positions. Whereas it is about the result and the relative positions.
Ralf (from memory) was 10th on the all time list when he was appointed, where he remains.
Remember to scroll down past number 1, all the way to number 29.... (whilst bearing in mind the site's phrase 'more recent matches are more heavily weighted, and remembering position number 2 for any Ferguson apologists you happen to mention the fact to)
Spotted this morning on Facebook, bravo if it originated on here.
"They should have got Bruce in full time, She was available and with her work on antiques roadshow, Fiona might have been able to get the most out of cavanni and Ronaldo