United Thread - 2021/22

Status
Not open for further replies.
There going to fluke this arent they, Chelsea will implode chasing everything, we have no striker and will look good going into the transfer window so we wont spend to our detriment and liverpool on a downward spiral. How can they go so long not losing an away game ??
 
O
uwerosler28 said:
There going to fluke this arent they, Chelsea will implode chasing everything, we have no striker and will look good going into the transfer window so we wont spend to our detriment and liverpool on a downward spiral. How can they go so long not losing an away game ??
Click to expand...

Did you watch them today and did you watch City yesterday? what’s the difference between a team that can dominate a game and a team that is playing mid level premier league standard football that leaves them wide open to conceding?

We’ve knocked 10 goals in two games with zero answer. This is without De Bruyne, Foden, Mahrez and Sterling not starting, City can get better this is as good as it gets for the rags.
 
feedmpenzaandhewillscore said:
O


Did you watch them today and did you watch City yesterday? what’s the difference between a team that can dominate a game and a team that is playing mid level premier league standard football that leaves them wide open to conceding?

We’ve knocked 10 goals in two games with zero answer. This is without De Bruyne, Foden, Mahrez and Sterling not starting, City can get better this is as good as it gets for the rags.
Click to expand...
Exactly. So long as they have that defence and defensive cover they're winning nothing - unless they end up in the Europa League again.
 
Can someone help me out please?

Unfortunately I can’t search by previously liked posts but there was a post by @Bill ? I think, a year or so back, which went into great detail about united’s initial investment, as well as Liverpool’s too (maybe), and how they wouldn’t be where they are today without it. I’d love to read it again. I’ve got a couple of rag mates who need educating. I’m sure it was in the united thread but I could be wrong. It got more than 100 likes I’m sure so hopefully someone can remember it and help me out.

Thanks in advance.
 
Brightwell Bros. said:
www.theguardian.com

Cristiano Ronaldo held Juventus back: just what do Manchester United see in him? | Jonathan Wilson

Returning superstar will certainly score goals, but his chief use at Old Trafford will be as a celebrity content provider
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
Click to expand...

"Call it the Sanchez protocol." :))) Brilliant!

United fans may wonder why some journos are critical, but the reason is pretty simple. Signing Ronaldo limits the opportunities for English talents like Rashford, Greenwood and Sancho. They have to compete for one place alongside Ronaldo, Fernandes and Pogba, unless Ole plays Pogba in CM next to Fred or McTominay, which seems a bit suicidal, imo. Today they looked utterly disjointed for most of the game, and not for the first time either.
 
Hart’s Bird said:
Can someone help me out please?

Unfortunately I can’t search by previously liked posts but there was a post by @Bill ? I think, a year or so back, which went into great detail about united’s initial investment, as well as Liverpool’s too (maybe), and how they wouldn’t be where they are today without it. I’d love to read it again. I’ve got a couple of rag mates who need educating. I’m sure it was in the united thread but I could be wrong. It got more than 100 likes I’m sure so hopefully someone can remember it and help me out.

Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Once you’ve found it/pointed at it, you can use the ‘bookmark’ icon at top right of the post (to the left of the post number) to store for future reference against your BM login
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.