United Thread - 2022/23

[Colin Bells Boots]

It's an open forum bud, that's how it works. He's not wrong by the way. The thread isn't here just to abuse United or their fans, it's to discuss football.

Which works two ways, and Falcao - the OP who posted has a history of being a wum with me and others .

If they give it out, they deserve it back .

 

[James Morgan]

Didn't Ten Hag play someone accused of attempted murder when he was at Ajax.

Is that true?
If so, blows my pre conceived idea out of the water!!

 

[Centurions]

Which works two ways, and the OP who posted has a history of being a wum with me and others .

If they give it out, they deserve it back .

Yeah, I'm aware of him but just tear his football arguments to shreds. You never know, you may even educate him. I'll never understand why RAWK still exists as it seems to be just a cauldron of bile going round and round in circles. I don't want Bluemoon to go the same way. Even Redcafe are fairly sensible in comparison with them lot, with a lot fewer out and out twisted weirdoes accepted.

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

Yeah, I'm aware of him but just tear his football arguments to shreds. You never know, you may even educate him. I'll never understand why RAWK still exists as it seems to be just a cauldron of bile going round and round in circles. I don't want Bluemoon to go the same way. Even Redcafe are fairly sensible in comparison with them lot, with a lot fewer out and out twisted weirdoes accepted.

Appreciate your post, so thanks.

I generally read their shit and ignore them , but suddenly re-appearing , reignited my feelings towards his ilk.

They are not worth the mither imo , and even people I know who support the rags generally do not behave like the ones who post on here.

 

[Silva2021]

If he was a City player and the club didn’t pay him off and get rid I wouldn’t step foot inside the Etihad again .

We might not like their choice of club, but there are many decent United fans who will think likewise.

I also think we’ll have to acknowledge United for doing the right thing on this one, which they have every step of the way so far. It is tougher then simpler kicking out as you do have no legal reason and it is unfair dismissal, so an agreement needs to be made (in many ways a conviction would have been easier to deal with for United).

There is an argument that they have handled it better then City have Mendy so far (he played during the enquiry City would have been aware of, which again is a tough legal position).

That said if due to potential/ ability they do back track along the line that they have to trust the system and with the case being dropped, there is no reason for him not to be incorporated into the squad. However we do not condone any violence against women etc etc.

Then at that point they are absolute scum.

On this so far however they are not and any criticism of them is one we would not label against our own club in the same situation.

 

[carlosthejackal]

We might not like their choice of club, but there are many decent United fans who will think likewise.

I also think we’ll have to acknowledge United for doing the right thing on this one, which they have every step of the way so far. It is tougher then simpler kicking out as you do have no legal reason and it is unfair dismissal, so an agreement needs to be made (in many ways a conviction would have been easier to deal with for United).

There is an argument that they have handled it better then City have Mendy so far (he played during the enquiry City would have been aware of, which again is a tough legal position).

That said if due to potential/ ability they do back track along the line that they have to trust the system and with the case being dropped, there is no reason for him not to be incorporated into the squad. However we do not condone any violence against women etc etc.

Then at that point they are absolute scum.

On this so far however they are not and any criticism of them is one we would not label against our own club in the same situation.

Not saying they should sack him I doubt they have grounds but they can pay off his contract and show him the door .

 

[Blue Llama]

If he was a City player and the club didn’t pay him off and get rid I wouldn’t step foot inside the Etihad again .

Rather a high moral ground to take with your username!

 

[Aba452]

In my organisation there is the "substantive other reason" when there's an ongoing criminal case. However usually that's used once they're convicted, and we claim reputational damage suffered/ breach of contract, resulting in them being sacked.

Here, the charges have been dropped, the toerag hasn't been found innocent, so don't think reputational damage is applicable? Guessing his contract may be paid off.

If the rags attempt to reintegrate him, they will be rightly pilloried and sponsors might get even more itchy feet.

 

[Silva2021]

Not saying they should sack him I doubt they have grounds but they can pay off his contract and show him the door .

I’d be surprised if they did not or at least come to some agreement on terminating contract so he can play abroad.

As much as the club don’t want the protests etc Greenwood won’t either (not that I or anyone will care what he wants, but ultimately he does have a say in it). Normally women beaters are cowardly by nature so a move out of the spotlight could well be his preferred option.

The one thing in United’s favour on this is he never renewed so on about 30K per week, so fairly cheap in terms of footballer wages.

 

[Blue Mist]

It's an open forum bud, that's how it works. He's not wrong by the way. The thread isn't here just to abuse United or their fans, it's to discuss football.

What !! Nobody told me.