RodneyRodney
Well-Known Member
Does wor Jack borrow her band when he plays ?I like Alice.
Does wor Jack borrow her band when he plays ?I like Alice.
Aardvaark ? Wrong. He's from LongsightRag apologists are probably the worst of them all. Through ignorance and tunnel-vision they will not see that their club is in the wrong. They will not see that Rashford is a diving, cheating Aardvark because they'd rather look away. For the same reason they will not see that Ratboy jnr is a violent, bloody, mass-brawl just waiting to take place.
They will not see the preferential treatment they receive from match officials, and they certainly don't see that the media will not allow ANY criticism to be levelled at the club.
Years ago you could chat with some of the old rags, the genuine fans, season ticket holders, and if (once again) a dodgy refereeing decision had saved them they would admit it. They'd say stuff like: "Yeah, we got away with that one." But these young wankers nowadays would never in a billion light years admit favouritism from certain referees. Not a chance.
Let them stand up on their soapboxes, let them deny any and all accusations of suspect refereeing decisions. There is a whole big world out there that knows the truth.
She's just a shit Lewis Carroll.She's definitely on some of the same 'stimulants' Lewis Carroll was on when he wrote the book anyway.
I seem to recall he was very fond of young females.She's definitely on some of the same 'stimulants' Lewis Carroll was on when he wrote the book anyway.
I've previously mentioned the Pistonheads man united thread on here and they are the very worse for behaving exactly as you describe.Rag apologists are probably the worst of them all. Through ignorance and tunnel-vision they will not see that their club is in the wrong. They will not see that Rashford is a diving, cheating Aardvark because they'd rather look away. For the same reason they will not see that Ratboy jnr is a violent, bloody, mass-brawl just waiting to take place.
They will not see the preferential treatment they receive from match officials, and they certainly don't see that the media will not allow ANY criticism to be levelled at the club.
Years ago you could chat with some of the old rags, the genuine fans, season ticket holders, and if (once again) a dodgy refereeing decision had saved them they would admit it. They'd say stuff like: "Yeah, we got away with that one." But these young wankers nowadays would never in a billion light years admit favouritism from certain referees. Not a chance.
Let them stand up on their soapboxes, let them deny any and all accusations of suspect refereeing decisions. There is a whole big world out there that knows the truth.
I'd fully expect one of our players to be sent off for that, and if he wasn't to see it on a loop on Sky for at least a week.Just seen the sending off. We'd be gutted if one of our defenders was sent off for that. His foot hit the ball and deflected upwards towards the Soton player's leg. That was fucking harsh (but also funny as fuck).
WTF! Mind you, it's typical rag arrogance. Officials bending the rules out of 'respect'...what an obnoxious bunch of cûnts.went on to say that they are entitled to receive such treatment and it is done out of respect and reverence for the club!
Tackling with studs up isnt allowed anyway, and its called going over the top of the ball.Just seen the sending off. We'd be gutted if one of our defenders was sent off for that. His foot hit the ball and deflected upwards towards the Soton player's leg. That was fucking harsh (but also funny as fuck).
Honestly on Pistonheads they're far worse than anything you'll find on the caf, a load of armchair rags all Home Counties company director types, arrogant, entitled, obnoxious wankers.WTF! Mind you, it's typical rag arrogance. Officials bending the rules out of 'respect'...what an obnoxious bunch of cûnts.