United Thread - 2023/24

Status
Not open for further replies.
So - revenue up £65m, wages down by over £50m with overall operating expenses down by £12m yet they still made a hefty £42m loss.

And if you look at exchange rate impacts on their dollar-denominated loans, they gained £22m from that, meaning an underlying loss of nearly £65m. Last season, the equivalent figure was a loss on exchange of £59m, which contributed to a loss of £34m. Take that out and their underlying profit last year was £25m. Where the fuck does their money go, because it's clearly not going on stadium improvements.
 
So - revenue up £65m, wages down by over £50m with overall operating expenses down by £12m yet they still made a hefty £42m loss.

And if you look at exchange rate impacts on their dollar-denominated loans, they gained £22m from that, meaning an underlying loss of nearly £65m. Last season, the equivalent figure was a loss on exchange of £59m, which contributed to a loss of £34m. Take that out and their underlying profit last year was £25m. Where the fuck does their money go, because it's clearly not going on stadium improvements.
The 50 million wages loss was achieved by fucking off PR38.
 
So - revenue up £65m, wages down by over £50m with overall operating expenses down by £12m yet they still made a hefty £42m loss.

And if you look at exchange rate impacts on their dollar-denominated loans, they gained £22m from that, meaning an underlying loss of nearly £65m. Last season, the equivalent figure was a loss on exchange of £59m, which contributed to a loss of £34m. Take that out and their underlying profit last year was £25m. Where the fuck does their money go, because it's clearly not going on stadium improvements.
Uncle Avram has to eat.
Oh and whenever you’re discussing united’s losses please use the word ‘minor’ ; )
 
So - revenue up £65m, wages down by over £50m with overall operating expenses down by £12m yet they still made a hefty £42m loss.

And if you look at exchange rate impacts on their dollar-denominated loans, they gained £22m from that, meaning an underlying loss of nearly £65m. Last season, the equivalent figure was a loss on exchange of £59m, which contributed to a loss of £34m. Take that out and their underlying profit last year was £25m. Where the fuck does their money go, because it's clearly not going on stadium improvements.

Reading between the lines, not much chance of the roof being fixed then..?
 
Onana has already come to his defence like Mendy did Berny amd said no one business to be offended by it.

Be intresting to see if they accept his comments and ignore the tweet, unlike with Berny
I agree with Onana here. However, I'm sure the Guardian readers will be up in arms about it
 
Just when you thought he couldn't be any more of a bell-end, I give you the oracle that is Jamie O'Hara ...

"Manchester United and Liverpool are going to be the biggest clubs in the UK forever because of their history – it’s as simple as that.

I don’t care how many trophies you win – you could win 10 Champions Leagues and you are never going to be as big as Manchester United. There’s only one team in Manchester, and that’s Man United.

History is what matters. Never in a million years are Manchester City going to be as big as Manchester United. We could be playing in 40, 50, 100 more years, we could even be playing on another planet, and United will be bigger than City. City can’t even fill their own ground! Football goes round in cycles – Manchester City are having their time now because they’ve got Pep Guardiola in charge – but I believe Man United will come back, because they’re Man United.

You can’t compare Manchester City to the likes of Real Madrid. Real Madrid and Barcelona are always going to be Real Madrid and Barcelona, and Liverpool and Manchester United are always going to be Liverpool and Manchester United – no matter what decade. They’re still the biggest clubs in the world. Manchester City are owned by a state and they’ve got Pep Guardiola as their manager, but let me tell you, that will eventually change.”
Almost like he's saying complete nonsense to attract listeners and callers...

Almost like that's their modus operandi...
 
I agree with Onana here. However, I'm sure the Guardian readers will be up in arms about it
Yes, I do too. It was as offensive as Berny and Mendy, ie. Not at all, unless you are gutter press, sky talkshite BBC EPL and don’t like sky blue shirts- at which point you should be hung drawn and quartered, nailed to a stake, burned and ridiculed, fined and banned.
 
Yes, I do too. It was as offensive as Berny and Mendy, ie. Not at all, unless you are gutter press, sky talkshite BBC EPL and don’t like sky blue shirts- at which point you should be hung drawn and quartered, nailed to a stake, burned and ridiculed, fined and banned.
I remember the incident but I cannt remember what Bernardo said/tweeted about Mendy...what was it?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.