United Thread | 2024/25

Status
Not open for further replies.
So now they want their own council house?

700 million quid in debt and want to spend 2 billion on a new stadium but not actually pay for it.

Can't even afford to fix the roof and owe a fucking mint in transfers on players that are no longer even there.

They'll go bump before they've got somewhere new to play. They'll be lucky to get 6th next season
 
feedmpenzaandhewillscore said:
It’s desperate stuff from the raggies fanfaring they might be going to a 100k capacity stadium, Radcliffe knows it wires straight into their insecure obsession with them being the biggest and bestest in the world. Who’s going to pay for all this though? A club that is binning off its staff and is over a billion in debt and is giving contract extensions to Johnny Evans, the maths don’t stack up. A project this size will probably end up costing over half or two thirds of the clubs value.

And if they did build a 100k seater stadium, won’t it look a bit odd on Thursday nights with vast parts of it not open as the bestest fans in the world didn’t fancy turning up?
Click to expand...
They could always give away free tickets to schools and count them in the figures when they don't turn up.
They do this already.
 
manimanc said:
www.skysports.com

Man Utd on front foot with transfers and pre-season preparations despite Leny Yoro and Rasmus Hojlund injury scares

Manchester United appear reinvigorated on and off the pitch as they continue their pre-season preparations in the US, writes Sky Sports News senior reporter Melissa Reddy; club are awaiting scan results on injuries to Leny Yoro and Rasmus Hojlund
www.skysports.com www.skysports.com

Fuck me the ministry of lies at it again.

Without a shadow of doubt there is something fishy going on here, they are absolutely shite yet they are being buttered up like they are the top dogs.

And the fact this annoying scouse gobshite is banging the red mardarses drum arouses suspension even more.

You keep an eye on their first 4 or 5 games, dodgy decisions aplenty.
Click to expand...
Not sure we'll be able to tell to be honest as that sounds just like pretty much every season
 
kippaxwarrior said:
See the Sly Sports hype machine is well and truly up and running with their new signings and potential signing.

All bargains and world class apparently.

They never fucking learn do they?
Click to expand...

While talking about shipping out all there garbage to other premier clubs every window it's Groundhog Day with the scum and skyscum
 
Last edited:
N1985 said:
So now they want their own council house?

700 million quid in debt and want to spend 2 billion on a new stadium but not actually pay for it.

Can't even afford to fix the roof and owe a fucking mint in transfers on players that are no longer even there.

They'll go bump before they've got somewhere new to play. They'll be lucky to get 6th next season
Click to expand...


It's like someone taking you for a meal because you're skint and you order the Lobster and champagne, cheeky bastards.
 
It's truly offensive that SlySports deny that they are biased towards the rags. It's not only offensive but it's also disingenuous, and it's a downright slap in the face of the people who buy subscriptions.
Their customers are being force-fed a diet of rags: if they are not the main match they WILL be the talking point in the studio. And this has been the way since the days of Andy Gray and Richard Keys, all other clubs have been shunted to the sidelines ever since. Whoever happens to be playing the vermin is treated as an afterthought, an uninvited gatecrasher at Sly's rag love-in. But the most hideous part of it all is that they are still going, despite all these years of being nothing more than a supporters club channel.

I wouldn't allow those duplicitous bastards to broadcast their propaganda into my living room, I truly wouldn't.
 
KentBlue said:
It's truly offensive that SlySports deny that they are biased towards the rags. It's not only offensive but it's also disingenuous, and it's a downright slap in the face of the people who buy subscriptions.
Their customers are being force-fed a diet of rags: if they are not the main match they WILL be the talking point in the studio. And this has been the way since the days of Andy Gray and Richard Keys, all other clubs have been shunted to the sidelines ever since. Whoever happens to be playing the vermin is treated as an afterthought, an uninvited gatecrasher at Sly's rag love-in. But the most hideous part of it all is that they are still going, despite all these years of being nothing more than a supporters club channel.

I wouldn't allow those duplicitous bastards to broadcast their propaganda into my living room, I truly wouldn't.
Click to expand...

It's why a lot of football fans up and down the country chucked their subscriptions in and went with IPTV. Fed up of it being wall to walk rag and Scouse shite. I wouldn't give the cunts a penny and I don't even watch it with it being basically free to me.
 
KentBlue said:
It's truly offensive that SlySports deny that they are biased towards the rags. It's not only offensive but it's also disingenuous, and it's a downright slap in the face of the people who buy subscriptions.
Their customers are being force-fed a diet of rags: if they are not the main match they WILL be the talking point in the studio. And this has been the way since the days of Andy Gray and Richard Keys, all other clubs have been shunted to the sidelines ever since. Whoever happens to be playing the vermin is treated as an afterthought, an uninvited gatecrasher at Sly's rag love-in. But the most hideous part of it all is that they are still going, despite all these years of being nothing more than a supporters club channel.

I wouldn't allow those duplicitous bastards to broadcast their propaganda into my living room, I truly wouldn't.
Click to expand...
Me neither.
But fans of all the other clubs shouldn't have to pay the same subscriptions as the Rags.
Totally unfair, as everything on there is just catered to the red scum, without a thought of teams like Brighton, Brentford Fulham etc etc.
 
KentBlue said:
It's truly offensive that SlySports deny that they are biased towards the rags. It's not only offensive but it's also disingenuous, and it's a downright slap in the face of the people who buy subscriptions.
Their customers are being force-fed a diet of rags: if they are not the main match they WILL be the talking point in the studio. And this has been the way since the days of Andy Gray and Richard Keys, all other clubs have been shunted to the sidelines ever since. Whoever happens to be playing the vermin is treated as an afterthought, an uninvited gatecrasher at Sly's rag love-in. But the most hideous part of it all is that they are still going, despite all these years of being nothing more than a supporters club channel.

I wouldn't allow those duplicitous bastards to broadcast their propaganda into my living room, I truly wouldn't.
Click to expand...
Yep this is bang on.

'So Gary Neville, final score was Fulham 2, Bournemouth 1. Would you say that's a fair result?'

'Well I think Bournemouth created some good chances, but as we've seen in recent Manchester United games, you have to take your chances. As an example here's an replay of Hoijlund's chance last week against Villa. If he'd scored that you could argue the result would have been different.'

'OK thanks Gary but specifically on this game, did you feel Bournemouth missed the finishing of Solanke today?'

'Possibly, but like we've seen with Manchester United, you can't blame injuries. Here's a replay of Garnacho scoring an overhead kick against Everton'

'.......'
 
N1985 said:
It's why a lot of football fans up and down the country chucked their subscriptions in and went with IPTV. Fed up of it being wall to walk rag and Scouse shite. I wouldn't give the cunts a penny and I don't even watch it with it being basically free to me.
Click to expand...
Same for me. I use my brother in laws virgin account. Turn it on at kick off and mute it at half time. Turn it off as soon as final whistle goes
 
bridgeno1 said:
Seeing as Labour have cut winter fuel payments to pensioners I'd imagine there's fuck all chance without inciting riots.
Click to expand...
I look at it the opposite way. If the Labour gov't have gotten away with freezing half the pensioners to death, then they'll think they can get away with anything, and probably will.
 
Mad Eyed Screamer said:
Why don't the rags simply ask each and every one of the 657 million fans they claim to have to chip in one quid each to a ''Go Build Me'' fundraiser? Donate 2 quid and you get your name written on a special wall on the outside of the ground for all to see forever.
Click to expand...
And that will be a special wall Blues will piss on after we beat them at old Trafford on derby day.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top