United Thread | 2025/26

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
It’s in two parts the debt the Glazers bought the club with and then their operating debt. The operating debt has gone up with their summer transfer activities, which is shocking considering all the lay offs they made to save money. Their policy of paying for players over an extremely long period of time means they are still paying for Sancho and Casemiro’s transfers as an example. They simply don’t have the cash reserves to pay up front to shorten the payment periods.

The piss funny thing is after all the noise the raggy fan base made about boycotting the Glazers and reducing their revenue streams. The merchandising and retail part of the business was one area of the business which showed growth from last years accounts. You can’t make this shit up.
Yes, but my question is who are the lenders, mate? Where has the borrowed money come from?
 
Yes, but my question is who are the lenders, mate? Where has the borrowed money come from?

There will be banks and financial institutions that know they can rinse them for interest so they repeatedly keep giving them credit facilities. It’s perfect for a bank as they know United will always look at improving their revenue streams so they are good for payment but will always be outliving their means trying to bring back the glory days. They are forever stuck in that debt cycle.
 
They would have been in trouble if there mate at Chelsea didn’t buy Crapanute now they need to get champs league or sell a player! Now who do you thing they’ll sell there mates again!? Mainoo my bet pure profit some mug will pay 50m
 
Not sure if true but don't they owe something like 40 mill for players they have bought on the drip ?
If so was this taken into account?
 
The country is infested with rags and the tv companies are cashing in on it….
Yet strangely their last home FA Cup Tie (Fulham) wasn't anywhere near a sellout attendance, albeit initially they tried to claim a laughable 74,000, before revising the figure to a dubious 67,000.

It might be different this time, but only because it's literally their only chance of success.
 
And the best part of this is they haven't paid a penny off the debt and the costs of servicing it keeps going up, they've no staff left to sack, the scum have nowhere left to turn. Happy Days
We've heard a version of this each of the last ten years or so, yet here they still are.
 
Last edited:
And the best part of this is they haven't paid a penny off the debt and the costs of servicing it keeps going up, they've no staff left to sack, the scum have nowhere left to turn. Happy Days

And they want to spend north of £2.5 billion on a new stadium. Even with the £300 million from the council to move a freight yard. Where will they get the rest of it to build it?
 
From now until 7 Feb (after which the tv schedules have not been decided) EVERY ONE OF RAG’S MATCHES IS ON TV (I make that the next 11 of their games)

There is definitely some brown envelopes being passed by scruffy Jim to the media to help him with their HUGE debt.

What other explanation is there!!
You would think us and the rest of the clubs would be asking some questions about this !
 
You would think us and the rest of the clubs would be asking some questions about this !
It’s really strange. I’ve not seen any comments about it anywhere but I can’t recall any club having every match televised for such a long period.
 
From now until 7 Feb (after which the tv schedules have not been decided) EVERY ONE OF RAG’S MATCHES IS ON TV (I make that the next 11 of their games)

There is definitely some brown envelopes being passed by scruffy Jim to the media to help him with their HUGE debt.

What other explanation is there!!
None it’s all pre determined to try bail em out, plus I’m pretty certain they are the only game on tv on these days so every **** will be tuning in to watch some football
So sky will get more revenue.
Win Win
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top