super_city_si
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2007
- Messages
- 57,570
You would think hes said no to something. Worrying what it could have been. And will the next guy say yes.sacking your most senior general is a sign that a war is going well
You would think hes said no to something. Worrying what it could have been. And will the next guy say yes.sacking your most senior general is a sign that a war is going well
Guaranteed the next guy will say yes as it'll be a question in his interviewYou would think hes said no to something. Worrying what it could have been. And will the next guy say yes.
Probably going to Kharg, he knows they’ll get slaughteredYou would think hes said no to something. Worrying what it could have been. And will the next guy say yes.
Must’ve told him that he’s a stupid ****!It's all going tits up for Trump in the US - this is evidence of this.
USA dropped not only one but 2 atom bombs on 2 cities in Japan when just one dropped on a desert like area would demonstrate superiority.
They have previous for it.
And if Satsuma Head insults him, on live tv ? And let's face it, the chances of that happening are huge.It’s the 250th anniversary of American independence and that’s why the King is visiting Trump, it’s not about Trump it’s about the people marking a very special occasion in the history of Britain and America officially one for the history book.
The same historical page as Trump and the war in Iran is on, I can understand the reasoning behind the visit it’s about the two countries regardless of the President
My speculation was that they could have achieved the same result differently ie a warning of things to come. If not then kill citizens with the second bomb if that is what is needed rather than preferred.As do we, the Germans, the Japanese and others all have “previous”.
There is no singularly agreed reason why Japan eventually surrendered, a few likely theories and there is debate about why the US dropped 2 bombs within a few days of each other. Your suggestion that dropping a bomb in the desert would be enough is pure speculation.
My speculation was that they could have achieved the same result differently ie a warning of things to come. If not then kill citizens with the second bomb if that is what is needed rather than preferred.
I agree Coventry and Dresden particularly were targeted during WW2 with direct attack on citizens.
Totally agree and in fairness it has prevented an uneasy peace since.You may well be right but we have to remember the mindset at the time. It is speculated that Dresden was a warning to the Russians, and there was clear thinking that terror campaigns could bring political outcomes (it seems there still is). Another example being the bombing of Tokyo with conventional weapons in a single 24 hour period that is estimated to have killed more than Hiroshima.
It would be far more preferable for humanity that lunatics like Hitler didn’t exist but sadly they still do today.
Totally agree and in fairness it has prevented an uneasy peace since.
Unfortunately we have Pres Trump and the Israeli chief claiming Iran is an unfit regime to have nuclear weapons.
Pot, kettle and black is my feelings.
Just to let you know this may be true but 1.5m Gazans are now homeless due to IDF actions - many will want to travel to the UK. Don't say you were not warned.
I noticed quite a lot of people in Jewish clothing coming into Manchester Airport a few nights ago.
I was trying to work out which flight they been on and the only one I could see just landed was Sharm al Sheik, must cross the border I think
As soon as you mention treaty of Paris the dumb fuck will put tariffs on the French.He should tell him in person the UK is revoking Article 1 of the 1783 Treaty of Paris. He won’t have a clue what that means but it is the recognition by the Kingdom of GB of the USA as a sovereign nation. In other words we intend to repossess it.
Was it Jewish people?I noticed quite a lot of people in Jewish clothing coming into Manchester Airport a few nights ago.
I was trying to work out which flight they been on and the only one I could see just landed was Sharm al Sheik, must cross the border I think
Lol yes don't think it was fancy dress !Was it Jewish people?
The **** thinks Sacre Bleu is a cheese.
Two different types of bombs dropped on two previously unscathed cities so as to best judge the effects. As the headline in The Times said, it was a "successful experiment".As do we, the Germans, the Japanese and others all have “previous”.
There is no singularly agreed reason why Japan eventually surrendered, a few likely theories and there is debate about why the US dropped 2 bombs within a few days of each other. Your suggestion that dropping a bomb in the desert would be enough is pure speculation.