US Politics Thread

Ohhhhh . . . now it's a "working majority." Funny how that's changed from "all."

Re. Tlaib condemned it. She's a Democrat. Guess that's not all then.

Now let's turn to the other comment about my "precious Democrats" (from the guy who voted for Reagan, Bush 1 and Romney, but whatever) who, by the way, I have never once defended on this topic -- ever. (Saying Biden and many other US politicians of both stripes are in a tough spot given the import of their pro-Israel constituencies -- which I have done -- is not the same).

Where do I stand on the issues here? Obviously you already know so I'll let you wax poetic.
I don't care where you stand. You are cultish in your adherence to your chosen party, so it's not really a discussion as such. I just hope your lack of critical thinking and myopic thought doesn't rub off on the next generation.......
 
Yes, I'm aware of our own token effort. It must be annoying and slightly inefficient in terms of wasted ammo to have to shoot Palestinians rather than just bury them alive with bulldozers.

All it does is make digging the ditches for mass graves harder. Perhaps the IDF will just bomb the ground into craters rather than break a sweat. Or just leave the bodies to rot in the open.

The silver lining for foggy is that unlike Germany, the Americans haven't claimed that they have to support Israel's genocide because of shame about their own. Probably the sickest justification so far.
 
All it does is make digging the ditches for mass graves harder. Perhaps the IDF will just bomb the ground into craters rather than break a sweat. Or just leave the bodies to rot in the open.

The silver lining for foggy is that unlike Germany, the Americans haven't claimed that they have to support Israel's genocide because of shame about their own. Probably the sickest justification so far.
No, it's just business for them.
 
The thing is, is that any worse than professing to be concerned about the slaughter of Palestinians while being complicit via inaction / tacit support?
While i dont think thats what said Congressman said. I think saying innocent people ate not innocent is far was than people eho ste concerned. Regardless of whether they act against it or not.

And inaction is NOT support. Its just inaction. The viewing of in action as complicit tacit support is the very type of reasoning someone who thinks innocent children are not so innocent is suing.


Which unfortunately will make your reasoning quite similar to that Congressman's.

Come on MSC, you are way better than that.
 
To be fair, we are witnessing the metamorphosis of a global superpower into a 6th form common room, albeit one stacked high with automatic rifles.

A bit of truculence is to be expected.
History may invent a portmanteau word for it.

Trumpulence.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.