US Politics Thread

It wouldn't surprise me if it was.

We agree Donald a giant manbaby and his mate might have touched a nerve. No doubt moron will tell us if Trump had ostracized him for asking,and will happily spin that for his own gain to get his Frost/Nixon moment.
This wont be fake - no way Trump agrees to do anything like this.
 
The only "clueless" posters on this thread are the ones who refuse to acknowledge (by their collective silence on it) that the biggest business invests in BOTH parties to get what they want when it comes to legislation, when it comes to taxes, subsidies and healthcare.

At least two of those examples involve taxpayer money to the tune of millions/ billions. As a result the politicians on both sides and in Big Business pockets, get to enrich themselves over what's right for the people. This is why 'incrementalism' is the go-to move with both parties as 'at least they're doing something' without really doing too much.

So yeah, again, both parties are essentially the same.

This has been the ONLY argument used but, time and again, that is ignored by the usual lot who rinse and repeat the misuse of the term to apply it to any old political incident.
 
It’s been said before, but it just happened to crop up in the JASR household tonight with visitors from NZ (feeling happy about Jacinda - more jobs, less debt, truth over fiction etc)…
When ‘US’ people talk about Biden/Democrats being left wing Commies… and we look at each other and go ‘hmm maybe just about centre, maybe a tad right-wing’… it shows where many Non-RINO’s are… far… far right wing, in the land of full-on fascism (the antithesis of US ‘freedom’)
 


Weird system over there isn’t it.


for a system supposed to be about freedom of expression and keeping political partisanship out of things its riddled with political partisanship isn't it? It seems that coz I can cut my own toenails if my Mrs was a Republican donor and Trump supporter I can be made a heart surgeon.......
 
The only "clueless" posters on this thread are the ones who refuse to acknowledge (by their collective silence on it) that the biggest business invests in BOTH parties to get what they want when it comes to legislation, when it comes to taxes, subsidies and healthcare.

At least two of those examples involve taxpayer money to the tune of millions/ billions. As a result the politicians on both sides and in Big Business pockets, get to enrich themselves over what's right for the people. This is why 'incrementalism' is the go-to move with both parties as 'at least they're doing something' without really doing too much.

So yeah, again, both parties are essentially the same.

This has been the ONLY argument used but, time and again, that is ignored by the usual lot who rinse and repeat the misuse of the term to apply it to any old political incident.
Just a quick one, mate, are you US based or UK?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.