FogBlueInSanFran
Well-Known Member
Oh. Can you explain specifically how it’s wrong?Also, your characterization of our point of contention regarding Trump is wrong.
Oh. Can you explain specifically how it’s wrong?Also, your characterization of our point of contention regarding Trump is wrong.
You think the Jan 6th hearings were a 'party political broadcast'?Even though l just dip into the crazy world of US politics on occasion it's plain to see how the so called Democrats manipulate the media like the Russians and their 'training exercises' in Ukraine. If Americans didn't want to to watch the party political broadcast of the Jan 6th hearing they had to turn their Tvs off because of blanket coverage directed by a tv man who just happens to be a member of the wealthy white Democrat elite. And of course as you say all the current present and future can be swept under the table some more.
I’m genuinely shocked you’re interested in his view on that tbh. He’s not commenting in good faith and there’s not a chance in hell he watched more than 2 minutes of it and I’d be surprised if it was that much or any at all.You think the Jan 6th hearings were a 'party political broadcast'?
I'm genuinely interested why you think that.
I watched it and all I saw was straight up reporting of what the committee had discovered which was evidence of organised violence and lies orchestrated and promulgated by people closely connected to one person and for one purpose, to subvert the results of a lawful election. Just because the evidence points in one direction it doesn't make it party political.
I’m genuinely shocked you’re interested in his view on that tbh. He’s not commenting in good faith and there’s not a chance in hell he watched more than 2 minutes of it and I’d be surprised if it was that much or any at all.
I was giving him the opportunity to explain his reasoning, but I'm really not expecting it to make any sense.I’m genuinely shocked you’re interested in his view on that tbh. He’s not commenting in good faith and there’s not a chance in hell he watched more than 2 minutes of it and I’d be surprised if it was that much or any at all.
The only thing he has managed to do in these threads is make Dax and Bigga seem more reasonable and sane.
I wonder if his sermons are written in the same style.
Police just arrested 31 people from the Patriots front in a U haul on their way to a pride event for conspiracy to riot.
Found riot weapons and smoke grenades in the van and some reports are saying guns as well.
Really?I believe CNN are supposedly 'making efforts' to be 'less partisan' as their rating are super low.
Make of that what you will...
Really?
So are MSNBCs with their don't question biden but call Trump a **** every hour.
The challenging question for me is who’s going to run for the Democrats if Biden doesn’t or can’t. I’ve felt for a long time that he was a four-year President — a “bridge” name, so I’ve been wondering this for awhile.It had to happen. The reporting of politics are wholly divided for mistruths and mis/disinformation for centre left and right.
Just because the right do it more doesn't mean it's correct for the centre left media to encroach on that methodology i.e., two wrongs don't make a right.
It's fucked up that supposedly 'intelligent' posters on these threads would rather not question what it sees on MSM as national polls render their verdict on how this administration is handling events in its tenure.
And these posters think they're above criticism by ignoring well reasoned questions by other participants. Shows the intention of the posters on this thread, creating their own circle jerk for collective appreciation instead of dealing with challenging questions.