US Politics Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
Vienna_70 said:
Kamala will be 60 in October.
Click to expand...
Yep, so she can do 2 terms before her 70th Birthday.

Johnny Mars Bar said:
She looks and acts a lot younger than that.

I thought she was early 50s, maybe even late 40s
Click to expand...

She does look a young 60. It's a very visual contest. There's not been many fat bald presidents. Trump must be the fatest and possibly the only obese potus since the invention of TV.
 
domalino said:
So we're lucky that Trump agreed...

Luck.
Click to expand...
Fair enough. I think it was a Master stroke on their part. They feared correctly that Biden wasn't up to it and Trump was too eager to comply.

No doubt Democrats are fantastic at political maneuvering
 
threespires said:
So he seems to be claiming that he's been swizzled into spending his money? So he's the elderly man with declining cognitive abilities who has been the victim of the double glazing salesmen that are the Democratic Party?

Interesting attack line for a guy who is as bigley brained and virile as trump.
Click to expand...
If a president decides not to run for a second term, is that an official act with immunity?
 
Vienna_70 said:
No hypocrisy there, then.
Click to expand...



They're panicking because they spent billions trying to make this election all about age, and all of a sudden they’re on the wrong side of that.

SO much time and money poured into making age the key issue, and now they've got the oldest presidential candidate in history running against someone who looks 30 years younger.

I genuinely think some people in the middle are going to think that if Biden was too old to run now, Trump must be too old to be president in 3 years time (there’s 3 years between them).
 
Last edited:
I'm giving it till weekend till the first leaks of Republicans wondering out soft why the shooter only nicked his ear.
 
Dax777 said:
Again, you've missed the point of my claim. Why am I not surprised.

Epstein taking pictures with celebrities isn't the point. It's about how a fake Photoshop is a despicable act by despicable people when the person who is fake photoshopped is a Democrat but just a funny fake when the person has an R next to their name.

A response from you that would disprove my point would be one where 'left brain' people here called a left fake:

"Despicable! And something only a horrible human would do."

You'd never find such. What you'd find are post like yours that misses the point. Whether this is inadvertent or on purpose I don't know.
Click to expand...
OK. Try this AI image by Trump's team cynically used to target black voters. This was a deliberately fraudulent official electioneering ploy.

www.bbc.co.uk

Trump supporters target black voters with faked AI images

Faked images of black voters with Trump are a growing disinformation trend in the US election, the BBC finds.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
 
Dax777 said:
Again, you've missed the point of my claim. Why am I not surprised.

Epstein taking pictures with celebrities isn't the point. It's about how a fake Photoshop is a despicable act by despicable people when the person who is fake photoshopped is a Democrat but just a funny fake when the person has an R next to their name.

A response from you that would disprove my point would be one where 'left brain' people here called a left fake:

"Despicable! And something only a horrible human would do."

You'd never find such. What you'd find are post like yours that misses the point. Whether this is inadvertent or on purpose I don't know.
Click to expand...

www.nbcnews.com

Tape shows Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein discussing women at 1992 party

The November 1992 tape in the NBC archives shows Trump with Epstein more than a decade before Epstein pleaded guilty to felony prostitution charges in Florida.
www.nbcnews.com www.nbcnews.com

 
Harris makes it interesting but the USA should really get back, as should the UK, to concentrating on policies rather than personalities.
 
Palerider said:
Harris makes it interesting but the USA should really get back, as should the UK, to concentrating on policies rather than personalities.
Click to expand...
The election is very much also about policy, given Project 2025 lays out clearly what the MAGA apparatus plan to do if they gain the presidency again, and the power they have been wielding through the far-right Supreme Court Trump installed in his first term.
 
If I have posted this in the wrong thread I apologise but I wondered about this photoshopping/AIing stuff.

If someone publishes a picture of you with someone else that has been doctored by including someone who was not with you at the time but it could cause you problems, similar I guess to Kamala Harris appearing to be with Epstein(?), could you sue the publication/publisher/individual who posted that photo? Would it be considered libel? Surely you just can't go around willy nilly altering photos to put people in a bad light?
Or am I just being naive?
 
Eccles Blue said:
If I have posted this in the wrong thread I apologise but I wondered about this photoshopping/AIing stuff.

If someone publishes a picture of you with someone else that has been doctored by including someone who was not with you at the time but it could cause you problems, similar I guess to Kamala Harris appearing to be with Epstein(?), could you sue the publication/publisher/individual who posted that photo? Would it be considered libel? Surely you just can't go around willy nilly altering photos to put people in a bad light?
Or am I just being naive?
Click to expand...

Eccles this shitstorm has only just started, when the election fervour meets its inevitable crescendo the blurred line behind truth and lies will be even more blurred than this.

This isn't an election based on policies it's an election based solely and purely on cults, whatever cult you align yourself to is the TRUTH you'll believe.
 
Another thing that will play well for Harris is her Husband.

He looked genuinely happy for her when speaking and his body language showed it and her reciprocating showed no falsness.

I even think seeing him say "I love you" to her as she entered the stage will soften some voters towards her.

Compare that to VonShitzenpantz.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top