US Politics Thread

There are so many trying so hard to create a rif between Trump and Musk. They can't help themselves. Lol
There's no rift.

Trump has delegated his presidential role to Musk so he can play golf all day and occasionally shake other leaders hands whilst ranting on truth social with no comeback.
 
Democrats and their mainstream media friends have been lying directly and by omission about Biden for the last four years. The game's up.

The Biden administration is full of Obama's people, and quite a few Clinton folks. According to USA Today and UVA's Miller Center, 75% of Biden's top 100 aides worked for Kenya Slim. When it comes to Kamala Harris, who said she couldn't really think of anything she would have done differently to Biden (Obama 3), would we expect anything else?

The Democrats and their media allies from day one told us that Joe Biden was basically a moderate centrist, and his history proved that. Fine. What's fascinating is watching dyed-in-the-wool progressives attack Democrat Senator Joe Manchin and former Democrat Senator Krysten Sinema for de-railing what they call Biden's intended progressive agenda. Except it never was Biden's progressive agenda. Why on earth would a centrist Senator from Delaware have a progressive agenda? He always was a puppet that does what he is told.

The political class in America is made up of countless organizations, departments, and factions. However, four unique groups can be defined.

First are the politicians and all those who are appointed by politicians. Think of presidents, senators, and representatives, but also cabinet members, ambassadors, and federal judges. These are many of the most-visible members of the political class. They’re who people picture when they think of American politics.

Second, there are all the unelected bureaucrats who make up the permanent, administrative components of the federal government. Most of them can be found in the dozens of executive agencies located in and around Washington, DC. Where the first group is made up of a couple thousand people, the second group accounts for close to three million. It’s the bulk of the federal government.

The third group is what we can call the official or “court” intellectuals. These are the “experts” in academia and at think tanks, as well as the “journalists” at the most prominent media organizations, who excuse and justify the actions and ambitions of the rest of the political class.

As Murray Rothbard explained in the third chapter of Anatomy of the State, political authorities have always relied on intellectuals to affirm the state’s legitimacy in the minds of the broader population. Intellectuals, who are often frustrated with how little people are willing to pay for their intellectual services, are easily lured into serving the state’s interest in exchange for official recognition, access, and tax dollars.

The fourth and final group are the plutocrats. They are the people and firms who owe their profits and wealth to the actions of the federal government and who lobby and pay to use government power to line their pockets. Think of the heads of the big banks or the weapons companies that supply Washington’s war machine.

These four groups form the coalition that makes up the political class. The “establishment” simply refers to the established, or current, political class. And, together, this coalition works to empower and enrich themselves at the expense of everyone else.

Court intellectuals use their establishment-sanctioned “expertise” to argue that society’s problems must be solved with government interventions. Politicians offer to enact these interventions in exchange for votes and donations. Plutocrats work to warp the interventions to their own benefit and then lobby and pay politicians to legislate even more lucrative interventions. After they are enacted, the easily predicted bad consequences of the interventions are used by court intellectuals and politicians to justify even more interventions.

Meanwhile, the bureaucratic group gains jobs, money, and power that it works with court intellectuals to protect and expand. The ever-growing interventions build up more government power that is then offered up to interested plutocratic buyers. All the while, politicians put on their sham fights with each other over minor policy differences along with their electoral and legislative rituals to obscure the scam and to keep us all believing that we live in a representative democratic republic.

That is the cycle churning in Washington, DC. The fact that the president is cognitively impaired is essentially irrelevant.

That is unless it begins to wake the American public up to the fact that the government does not work for us like we were all taught it does in elementary school. But until then, the churn continues.

@mancity2012_eamo the above gives you a better bird's-eye view of American politics than anything Noam.has to say.offer.
 
There's no rift.

Trump has delegated his presidential role to Musk so he can play golf all day and occasionally shake other leaders hands whilst ranting on truth social with no comeback.
You know Trump isn't President yet right? He is doing more as the President Elect than the actual current President. Who hasn't done anything for months now
 
The party of conservative values and adherence to the Constitution has sold its soul to King Donald, because every last one of them is scared to fuck by his threats, and the Constitution is going to have to take care of itself because they are going to put themselves and their future largesse first!
Why are we assuming that Trump's agenda is outside the Constitutional mandate. That's an assertion with no proof.

As for Johnson being anything close to a RINO (not rhino!!), he is a “leader” in title only, because he knows that he has to try to get RE-elected in a month or two and if Trump says “Nyet!” then the drones will all line up to execute him!

It’s funny to watch a compromise choice, Christian Conservative kiss the ring of the LEAST Christian President in modern times, JUST to have proximity to power!

WWJD?!
He is kissing the ring or the leader of the party. I'm.amused at Democrats who bemoan Republicans who support the leader of their party.

Same people who called Manchin and Senema traitors are now frothing at the mouth all over TV hoping to find traitors. It's hilarious to watch
 
Yeah, it “works” to help stop the spread of polio, because the vaccine causes “soft tissue cancers,” correct? Do you need to watch the video clip where he says this with his own lips?!
Yes! Why even ask? You should have just posted the clip. And then add where he concluded we ought to ban the polio vaccine.
 
You know Trump isn't President yet right? He is doing more as the President Elect than the actual current President. Who hasn't done anything for months now

Well there's less than a month to go before his inauguration there's nothing left for Nepo Joe to do anymore. Pardons for his allies to prevent retribution from Trump is only job now.
 
He was the sitting President, against whom nobody ran, and it was too late for primaries. Additionally, having a party elect their leader/nominee is not a new thing and even a cursory scan of history would have told you this. Parties pick their leaders all the time.
CB, again what I take issue with is not what happened ,( i.e. that these pro democracy lovers couldn't even have a simple primary) but rather your assertion that not having a primary**was them making THE hard choice*** as opposed to the Republicans who were cowardly.

My issue is with your framing and understanding of which one was a hard choice.

While she meets the definition, as a woman of color, to suggest that was the only thing she had going for her is derogatory, both ethnically and misogynistically.
I know this kind of language works on liberals, But sorry it has no effect on me.

A DEI candidate position is a position in that is fielded with a requirement that only a specific group are allowed to apply. That group bses on race or gender or bith

Joe Biden created a DEI Vice Presidency position when he stated before hand that he'd only be considering Women of Color. He did that.

She the person is not a DEI. The position she filled was a DEI position. That's Biden who did that. If you think it's derogatory ethically and misogynistic then you have an issue with the idiot who created the position. Not me or Frank for merely pointing it out what is.

Would I have chosen her? No
When I get into a Democratic Party leadershop
Position, you know, like POTUS, I guess I can help make those decisions!

FWIW, I haven’t picked a Nominee (Republican or Democrat YET, and I’ve been voting for them for over 30 yrs!!
I won't mind voting for you to be fair. You strike as what many sold us Biden was. A centrist. Partisan but Centrist. I can live with that :)
They weren’t “the Guardians rankings,” they were “rankings reported by the Guardian”! You know, like a journalistic device! Nice try deflecting from his title WORST PRESIDENT IN HISTORY though!
Yes, you do know there are thousands of rankings of best American Presidents right? Pray tell which one did you think "the Guardian" will pick from. Certainly not the one that has him.rsnked as 6th best and the best President of the 20th century.

That' said my personal favorite President is never ranked highly. :)

I'll cover Hunter separately. Let me go moan in the Liverpool transfer forum for a bit.

 
So let me get this straight, you have an issue with him saying we ought to study the long term effects of the drugs and vaccines we use?

Coz that's all he said there. I Notice O'dumbell quickly switched to attacking him personally.

He even used the now popular and 'very effective' "convicted felon" line. Look at how well that worked the last time :)
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.