US Presidential Race 2016

Status
Not open for further replies.
At present, the entire idea of Wikileaks and their numerous anti-Hillary releases are under suspicion, because there are KNOWN FAKE LETTERS being released. There is some thought that these Wikileaks are more a part of a propaganda campaign than anything else.

As for Wikileaks being a source, I'm seeming jumping off from the original post, where Wiki was quoted, without the original source, so I can't know where it supposedly came from. If you see the source, other than Wikileaks, feel free to share it....or did you think I didn't know that Wikileaks is a clearing house for mostly stolen shit?!
It could actually be propaganda making out that Wikileaks is a propaganda campaign - unless the truth reveals itself you wouldn't know but as i'm sure you know, Wikileaks has been around a lot longer than this campaign period. Before someone labels me a tinfoiler for saying that, how can i look at something objectively if I previously believe one side to be "good" just because they are an allied government with similar national culture, especially when the other side is revealing damaging info about them? The article says "according to documents leaked by Wikileaks" or similar, so the document and it's author(s) are the source in my view - maybe you can take the view that the source available to you is via Wikileaks, particularly if you question it's validity then.
 
It could actually be propaganda making out that Wikileaks is a propaganda campaign - unless the truth reveals itself you wouldn't know but as i'm sure you know, Wikileaks has been around a lot longer than this campaign period. Before someone labels me a tinfoiler for saying that, how can i look at something objectively if I previously believe one side to be "good" just because they are an allied government with similar national culture, especially when the other side is revealing damaging info about them? The article says "according to documents leaked by Wikileaks" or similar, so the document and it's author(s) are the source in my view - maybe you can take the view that the source available to you is via Wikileaks, particularly if you question it's validity then.
My concern is the propaganda campaign taking place under the guise of being from Wiki. The level of hacking and propaganda in this particular campaign is unprecedented.
 
If BluePhil is not American why is he giving the amount of fucks he appears to?

We all agree the Hillary is probably a crook. Can he agree that Trump is a twatbadger?
So what are you saying? that I'm an American agent lmao?
 
It could actually be propaganda making out that Wikileaks is a propaganda campaign - unless the truth reveals itself you wouldn't know but as i'm sure you know, Wikileaks has been around a lot longer than this campaign period. Before someone labels me a tinfoiler for saying that, how can i look at something objectively if I previously believe one side to be "good" just because they are an allied government with similar national culture, especially when the other side is revealing damaging info about them? The article says "according to documents leaked by Wikileaks" or similar, so the document and it's author(s) are the source in my view - maybe you can take the view that the source available to you is via Wikileaks, particularly if you question it's validity then.
I would very much question the validity of anything coming from Wikileaks. Remember Assange is holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London because the Americans want to extradite him. Trump's already said he's Wikileaks' biggest fan so Assange will do anything he can to influence the election in favour of Trump.
 
I give a fuck because sadly our little Rock is in Americas pocket and if America elects hillary we will be dragged in to her wars with Syria and the rest of her shite foreign policy.

Also I'm against globalism in any form
 
I would very much question the validity of anything coming from Wikileaks. Remember Assange is holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London because the Americans want to extradite him. Trump's already said he's Wikileaks' biggest fan so Assange will do anything he can to influence the election in favour of Trump.

Assange is holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy because Sweden want to extradite him for sex offences.
 
I would very much question the validity of anything coming from Wikileaks. Remember Assange is holed up in the Ecuadorian embassy in London because the Americans want to extradite him. Trump's already said he's Wikileaks' biggest fan so Assange will do anything he can to influence the election in favour of Trump.
Wikileaks is the only source with a 100% accuracy rate. why did Shillary not deny the leaks in the third debate and why did CNN sack someone based on the leaks?

You're chatting shit if you doubt Wikileaks but suck the main stream media's cock. funny, but sad.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.