CitizenTID
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Feb 2013
- Messages
- 5,053
It could actually be propaganda making out that Wikileaks is a propaganda campaign - unless the truth reveals itself you wouldn't know but as i'm sure you know, Wikileaks has been around a lot longer than this campaign period. Before someone labels me a tinfoiler for saying that, how can i look at something objectively if I previously believe one side to be "good" just because they are an allied government with similar national culture, especially when the other side is revealing damaging info about them? The article says "according to documents leaked by Wikileaks" or similar, so the document and it's author(s) are the source in my view - maybe you can take the view that the source available to you is via Wikileaks, particularly if you question it's validity then.At present, the entire idea of Wikileaks and their numerous anti-Hillary releases are under suspicion, because there are KNOWN FAKE LETTERS being released. There is some thought that these Wikileaks are more a part of a propaganda campaign than anything else.
As for Wikileaks being a source, I'm seeming jumping off from the original post, where Wiki was quoted, without the original source, so I can't know where it supposedly came from. If you see the source, other than Wikileaks, feel free to share it....or did you think I didn't know that Wikileaks is a clearing house for mostly stolen shit?!