Citizen of Legoland
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Jan 2013
- Messages
- 10,104
But we tend to try and stop people harming others, is the pertinent fact here.People make choices and need to live with the consequences. That's life.
But we tend to try and stop people harming others, is the pertinent fact here.People make choices and need to live with the consequences. That's life.
I think both points are pertinent. As a society we make collective choices in order to protect public health, but people should be free to avoid being part of that if they wish. That is their choice and the hallmark of a free society, but they must accept that there are consequences for them, much the same as people who choose not to take a driving test cannot lawfully drive a car on a public highway.But we tend to try and stop people harming others, is the pertinent fact here.
Ah, got your point now. I agree.I think both points are pertinent. As a society we make collective choices in order to protect public health, but people should be free to avoid being part of that if they wish. That is their choice and the hallmark of a free society, but they must accept that there are consequences for them, much the same as people who choose not to take a driving test cannot lawfully drive a car on a public highway.
Princioles are fine, but they cannot be consequence free, otherwise they aren’t really principles, but choices. There is a difference.
Socoety can only function effectively if those who step outside conventions are free to do so, as long as it is lawful, but they must accept that there will be inconveniences for so doing. There’s no such thing as a free lunch.
People need to own their fucking decisions.
Plenty of those available as well if anyone doubts that this lunacy actually took placeThanks for that. I would have used contemporary media articles to look for it.
Surely the worst thing about social media is Miguel Delaney.Ah yes - the best thing about social media is that it gives everyone a platform for their views.
And the worst thing about social media is that it gives everyone a platform for their views.
We have speed limits on the roads to prevent people harming themselves and others. The same argument as used for vaccinations could easily and justly be applied to speed limits, an infringement of liberty, a restraint on those drivers who enjoy fast driving.I think both points are pertinent. As a society we make collective choices in order to protect public health, but people should be free to avoid being part of that if they wish. That is their choice and the hallmark of a free society, but they must accept that there are consequences for them, much the same as people who choose not to take a driving test cannot lawfully drive a car on a public highway.
Princioles are fine, but they cannot be consequence free, otherwise they aren’t really principles, but choices. There is a difference.
Socoety can only function effectively if those who step outside conventions are free to do so, as long as it is lawful, but they must accept that there will be inconveniences for so doing. There’s no such thing as a free lunch.
People need to own their fucking decisions.
Its a pre-requisite for all supporters of gods's own teamI’m a crank in real life as well Jimmy ;)
Never a true word spoken. All the waifs and strays think they are experts .Ah yes - the best thing about social media is that it gives everyone a platform for their views.
And the worst thing about social media is that it gives everyone a platform for their views.