kaz7
Well-Known Member
Yes and i'm not looking foward to the next game
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Var debate 2019/20
- Thread starter Chi-town blues
- Start date
Gaylord du Bois
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 29,262
- Location
- Great Umbrage.
- Team supported
- Glory Hunting Blue. Was Chelsea.
Am I correct to assume that fouls, in the penalty area, will not be var'd from now on ?
MadchesterCity
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 18,090
Is anyone else still pissed off?
Yup still raging, calmed down a lot but still really fucked off
You really do need to calm down a bit otherwise you`re gonna suffer a coronary if you carry on.
Hahaha, nah. After today it will be another 4 years before I decide to post on here again. You'll still be talking shit like you did before I quit BM back in 2015 and you'll still be stalling in years to come. All I asked for from you today, was to back up the stuff you claimed as fact. Why can't you provide a photo of the Sunday Mirror back page?
Cya babes. :)
i kne albert davy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 11,273
Clear and obvious luckily then.VAR spotted the handball that was missed by the officials and players
Some posters still can`t get their head around this sam.
Actually we can, most posters feel that it is a stupid new rule that the referee in charge of VAR chose to use even though there is little proof that there was definite contact and that his arm was only in that position because he had been grabbed by the defender, (so a penalty). A certain percentage of those posters also know/fear that the same new rule will not be used if the rags or dippers score. Further most posters are annoyed that IF has been legitimately chalked off by the VAR ref why did he not tell the idiot in the middle about a stonewall penalty. We have VAR and there is nowt we can do about it but all we ask is that it is fair, even and honest.
blue moony
Well-Known Member
Some posters still can`t get their head around this sam.
Have you got an ultra edge or a heat map showing 100 per cent the ball touched his arm ! Scientific proof ?
Not disputing the shit rule , disputing the evidence ! Scientific proof not we think it hit his arm !!
That’s the whole issue for me
Some posters still can`t get their head around this sam.
So you've not seen the numerous posts that point out the decision was actually wrong in law (football law) - the new law that is, not the old interpretation?
We are witnessing technology destroy a sport
The technology isn't the problem..It's the corrupt fuckers using it.
dronefromsector7G
Well-Known Member
Clear and obvious does not apply in this scenario it’s not subjectiveClear and obvious luckily then.