Var debate 2019/20

SWP's back said:
Oh come off it Karen. All season we’d heard that var would save them. Yesterday was the perfect opportunity but it didn’t come to their rescue.
Click to expand...
Not according to this thread, Its apparent now that the Origi foul wasn't one so Var hasn't gone against them.
 
The blue phantom said:
Not according to this thread, Its apparent now that the Origi foul wasn't one so Var hasn't gone against them.
Click to expand...

Yes that is the top and bottom of it. After the board going deathly quiet straight after the match those who have told us pre match that the game is corrupt and VAR/Refs are making decisions to favour Liverpool have come out swinging and are now denying the obvious.

We all know what the reaction would be if that goal was given against City and if anything their refusal to admit so has only weakened their argument because yesterday only highlights the blinkered nature of their view.
 
franksinatra said:
Yes that is the top and bottom of it. After the board going deathly quiet straight after the match those who have told us pre match that the game is corrupt and VAR/Refs are making decisions to favour Liverpool have come out swinging and are now denying the obvious.

We all know what the reaction would be if that goal was given against City and if anything their refusal to admit so has only weakened their argument because yesterday only highlights the blinkered nature of their view.
Click to expand...
Now that’s a surprise coming from you Frank.....
 
franksinatra said:
Yes that is the top and bottom of it. After the board going deathly quiet straight after the match those who have told us pre match that the game is corrupt and VAR/Refs are making decisions to favour Liverpool have come out swinging and are now denying the obvious.

We all know what the reaction would be if that goal was given against City and if anything their refusal to admit so has only weakened their argument because yesterday only highlights the blinkered nature of their view.
Click to expand...
I’ve read so many people bringing out the old cliche ‘it’s a contact sport......’ to justify it not being a foul, but the reality is lindeloff kicked origi and it should of been a foul.

The people trying to justify it are the same people saying VAR is bent to favour Liverpool as they can’t admit VAR is just a shit stain across the PL.
 
franksinatra said:
Yes that is the top and bottom of it. After the board going deathly quiet straight after the match those who have told us pre match that the game is corrupt and VAR/Refs are making decisions to favour Liverpool have come out swinging and are now denying the obvious.

We all know what the reaction would be if that goal was given against City and if anything their refusal to admit so has only weakened their argument because yesterday only highlights the blinkered nature of their view.
Click to expand...
A dropped couple of points doesnt hurt the dippers too much and a gained point for united is always good for the brand. The ideal result.
 
GaudinoMotors said:
A dropped couple of points doesnt hurt the dippers too much and a gained point for united is always good for the brand. The ideal result.
Click to expand...
A gained point for united is always good for the brand? What brand is that? The ‘united like to concede a late goal to draw at home’ brand? Not sure you’ve thought this through, mate :-)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.