BerkshireBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Jan 2015
- Messages
- 4,076
Most on here dont want it
hmm all the posts before and after your post suggests otherwise
Most on here dont want it
This is the main issue I have with it. An incident will only be VAR'd if the ref is also unsure right? He'll then call for VAR to be used so he can take a look. But in the incident you described the ref saw nothing wrong with the tackle, even though it was a clear penalty, so that wouldnt have gone to VAR.
Unless im missing something, is there someone in another room watching the match who can then tell the ref through a mic that he needs to take a look at something?
Yet most thought FFP was a great idea hahaha you couldn't make it up....
Oh sorry Gill and co did:-)
VAR is essential but the coaches MUST have 2 challenges per game to have play reviewed AND (most importantly) the footage should be replayed on the big screen in the stadia.
It is the only way to remove any possibility of referee bias.
RT @City_Watch: Pep on VAR:
“I think Manchester City agreed with VAR but the other top teams, United, Chelsea, I think didn’t want it. It’s OK. I think the referees must be helped. Football is quicker, faster. Before, the back four was not well organised, now all the teams are well organised.”