VAR thread 2022/23

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wasn't VAR supposed to provide objectivity?
As long as there's subjectivity it is inconsistent, open to abuse and therefore unfit for purpose - apart from manipulating subjectively desired outcomes. Should never have been introduced in this remedial state of development.
 
I think it was a yellow card,but I’ll go along with what carragher said a while back the ref makes the decision then VAR starts telling him you need to look at it again all while he’s heading over to screen the VAR official is talking to him planting that seed of doubt,when all he should be saying is go have a look nothing else..
 
Alan Harper's Tash said:
This bit. There is no evidence of Sky influencing any decision.

The referee decided whether he made an error or not. He could have gone to the screen and not changed his mind, should he have thought he was still right.

The only thing to debate here is what a clear and obvious error is. That is subjective and why we still have these red card debates.
Click to expand...
Sky can hear the Comms and vice versa.

Hinchcliffe preaching it's a yellow wouldn't have any bearing on the system would it? Like Carragher begging the rags handball goal stood against Brighton.


I just want us to hear the Comms in real time. Maybe then I wouldn't be so cynical that 3 weeks of super Sunday matches have had VAR calls that have manipulated the result.
 
OK Mr Tash, first ... I never advocated a one or three match ban. I saw an out of control foul, let someone else decide how many matches.
The referee agreed with me..... until Var intervened.
I said 2 feet were off the ground and he was out of control. The Premier League and pigmob stated 2 feet off the ground and out of control was a red so they like the referee today agreed with me.
Please explain where I am wrong ?
 
mat said:
Sky can hear the Comms and vice versa.

Hinchcliffe preaching it's a yellow wouldn't have any bearing on the system would it? Like Carragher begging the rags handball goal stood against Brighton.


I just want us to hear the Comms in real time. Maybe then I wouldn't be so cynical that 3 weeks of super Sunday matches have had VAR calls that have manipulated the result.
Click to expand...
Sure, they can hear what’s going on. We should too, imho.

They don’t contribute to the decision though.

I doubt anyone listens to Hinchcliffe, in any context.

It hasn’t manipulated today’s result. We may have gone on to win, but we don’t know for sure.

If Haaland had buried his late chance, we’d be chatting much more calmly about the VAR decision.
 
Blue Mist said:
OK Mr Tash, first ... I never advocated a one or three match ban. I saw an out of control foul, let someone else decide how many matches.
The referee agreed with me..... until Var intervened.
I said 2 feet were off the ground and he was out of control. The Premier League and pigmob stated 2 feet off the ground and out of control was a red so they like the referee today agreed with me.
Please explain where I am wrong ?
Click to expand...
It’s hard to prove he is out of control and there was no excessive force. He went in to trip KDB to stop a promising attack. He achieved that, without injuring the opponent.

The offence you are suggesting carries a 3 game mandatory ban.

You can tackle with both feet off the floor. You cannot hit your opponent with both feet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.