PannickAtTheDisco
Well-Known Member
Somebody help me here.. I mean, what is this? Is it a point made? a rant? I don't know.
doesn't surprise me, it sums up your position.
Somebody help me here.. I mean, what is this? Is it a point made? a rant? I don't know.
Rightly so.But it also shows with commemts like dipshit and little thing, that we at times don't even like or respect our fellow members of our species
Rightly so.
And ‘little thing’ is overly polite if anything.
true, must be them endorphins relesead after that steak making you mellow.
Some people don't like or respect our fellow man? - Halt the press!
Dogs are better than most humans.
Some people don't like or respect our fellow man? - Halt the press!
Dogs are better than most humans.
couldn't eat a whole one of eitherTbf prefer cats to dogs.
No our intelligence cannot make us complicit in the vaguaries of nature. We can only be complicit in how we react to it or deal with it. You are stretching moral philosophy to make your point. If we were not here, nature would be exactly as it is.The charge of nihilism is nonsense, unless you can show that our presence alone can affect the action of nature, as opposed to its effects, which we can mitigate, which I did not deny.Sounds nihilistic.
Intelligent moral agents (us) can see bad and good. Our intelligence makes us complicit. The lion and the wind are amoral. That's how it works now.