Vicky Kloss

bluenose45

Well-Known Member
Joined
22 Jun 2006
Messages
185
Location
Leafy Cheshire via Gorton
This is not a pop at her but a question to garner some views on whether the Club should be more proactive in countering some of the rubbish that's printed and broadcast about us?

Given all the media sniping at us, and this 'bite your lip' attitude the Club seems to be adopting, is our media/communications department doing enough to counter all the 'misinformation' that involves us? Or, is it about time the Club employed a 'big hitter' in this role to mount a counter-offensive?
 
The problem is, if we piss off the journos they will just write more and more shit about us.

Personally I just dont believe anything they say
 
It also doesn't help when some clowns in the crowd give the media plenty of ammunition. Don't throw coins and they wouldn't be able to write some of the recent shit.
 
lancs blue said:
It also doesn't help when some clowns in the crowd give the media plenty of ammunition. Don't throw coins and they wouldn't be able to write some of the recent shit.
And nobody can argue with that
 
We can't really be proactive in countering stories we haven't seen. But we have been proactive in giving certain more serious journalists better access and the stories from these guys have been more supportive. The journos who peddle shit are still going to peddle shit, whatever we do but if it reflects badly on the club and is clearly false then we will take action.

If you're asking do we want to become more like The Trafford edition of Pravda and ban anyone we just don't like, then my answer would be a resounding no.
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
We can't really be proactive in countering stories we haven't seen. But we have been proactive in giving certain more serious journalists better access and the stories from these guys have been more supportive. The journos who peddle shit are still going to peddle shit, whatever we do but if it reflects badly on the club and is clearly false then we will take action.

If you're asking do we want to become more like The Trafford edition of Pravda and ban anyone we just don't like, then my answer would be a resounding no.

But a public flogging or two wouldn't be so bad would it? Shame B of the Bang went, we could have strung one up on each spike.
 
bluenose45 said:
This is not a pop at her but a question to garner some views on whether the Club should be more proactive in countering some of the rubbish that's printed and broadcast about us?

Given all the media sniping at us, and this 'bite your lip' attitude the Club seems to be adopting, is our media/communications department doing enough to counter all the 'misinformation' that involves us? Or, is it about time the Club employed a 'big hitter' in this role to mount a counter-offensive?

I do believe the club knows best .
 
moomba said:
Prestwich_Blue said:
We can't really be proactive in countering stories we haven't seen. But we have been proactive in giving certain more serious journalists better access and the stories from these guys have been more supportive. The journos who peddle shit are still going to peddle shit, whatever we do but if it reflects badly on the club and is clearly false then we will take action.

If you're asking do we want to become more like The Trafford edition of Pravda and ban anyone we just don't like, then my answer would be a resounding no.

But a public flogging or two wouldn't be so bad would it? Shame B of the Bang went, we could have strung one up on each spike.
My personal preference would be to bury them up to their necks in the penalty area.
 
I think one of the things Vicky Kloss has be conscious of always is the long term effect that some short term publicity can have both for good and ill.

I have little doubt that the long term game plan is to get the media, if possible, eating out of our hand the way they currently do for the rags. An awful lot of what she lets go by without robustly challenging is done, I think, with this in mind, because being bolshy and argumentative every time there is a media story cures a short term headache but creates a long term enemy. If Vicky wielded the banhammer like the mods on here do (sorry guys ;)) that I think would jeopardise that long term strategy.

Personally, my view is that the spikes we have at the top of the 8 pillars which suspend the roof would make useful resting places for some heads. Ashton, Beasley, Custis, etc etc, but in the long term we need the media on side and beheadings do not help that cause.

Forgive the slight tangent, but when the pisscan finally goes there is going to be one almighty outpouring aimed at the rags. Whoever picks up the baton when he passes it on has got one almighty poisoned chalice (sorry, mixed metaphor there) because there will be a quarter of a century of slights insults and unremitting thuggery which stands to be avenged.

Back on topic, there are some issues where the media goes too far (eg Rob Beasley saying Mancini was int he ground when Hughes was axed) even with this 'softly softly' approach in mind. So the club acts, and will (if I understand it correctly) continue to act in appropriate cases, even though it lets go as much as it probably can let go. Of course it fucks me off mightily that there is so muich shite in the media that we don't challenge. But on the whole I think Vicky gets the balance about right.

The problem is, Vicky can hardly come on here and say 'Custis is a c@nt but I need him on side', so the thought process is probably not explained as clearly as it could be. But as I say, I'm pretty sure that when we turn the other cheek, it is because we have a longer term game plan in mind.

Our owners do Big Picture. We should learn to do it, too.
 
bluenose45 said:
This is not a pop at her but a question to garner some views on whether the Club should be more proactive in countering some of the rubbish that's printed and broadcast about us?

Given all the media sniping at us, and this 'bite your lip' attitude the Club seems to be adopting, is our media/communications department doing enough to counter all the 'misinformation' that involves us? Or, is it about time the Club employed a 'big hitter' in this role to mount a counter-offensive?

This isn't a pop but it is

Unless you have ever had a job handling media relations and I haven't we can hardly criticise her

Also if a journalist has an opinion we played bad in his write up and that we have spent too much money and yadda yadda blah blah it isn't libellous
If he prints that someone at the club is a paedophile without any proof the shit would hit the fan<br /><br />-- Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:14 pm --<br /><br />Oh by the way Shaun Custis comes on here apparently

Hi there you fat ****
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.