Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
To refute your conclusion about fans and ex players being though of as morons, consider this:
For the same reason fans and ex pros aren't consulted on a huge variety of topics such as
in the running of the club, is the same reason that fan's impressions on whether a player is good or bad enough at the club isn't used.
- finances,
- recruitment,
- match day line ups,
- positions players should play in,
- whom to bring on, or take off
- etc.
If in the above cases you concede that fans aren't thought of to be morons by the club staff, then similarly in our discussion you can't conclude that giving pertinence to statistics over the impressions of spectators is a tacit assertion of the latter's incompetence.
The 2nd rate crappy statistics used on here are only a piss poor version of the real thing & don't take most situations into account. They are only useful in the most part, to indicate the most basic traits & are mainly used to put down opinion & dumb down.discussion of what actually happened: 'the player didn't have a stinker because he won ten headers & ten tackles, here is the proof, you are all stupid'.
Most people understand how stats work & choose to use them as a bit of a backup guide to the overall impression rather than treating them as the bible.
The assumption then is that the reason they still hold the same opinion in spite of statistics, is because they don't understand how all powerful stats are.